In a sense.
The Constitutional Convention, in itself, did not replace the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was created at the Convention and it was based upon some of the ideals that the Articles of Confederation had, but had changed many things.
So, in a sense, no. The Constitutional Convention did notreplace the Articles of Confederation, but the Constitution that was created then did.
They was very mad that the delegates were trying to own there crops and still there slaves
Which delegate at the convention wanted to get rid of the states all together? *
Constitutional Convention
the articles of confederation should remain intact!
Because some people thought it was unfair
The delegates of the Constitutional Convention were supposed to revise the Articles of Confederation, not create an entirely new government. This four month convention in Philadelphia lasted from May 25 to September 17, 1787.
No he did not believe so.
Rewrite the Articles of Confederation.
Revise the articles of confederation
To amend the Articles of Confederation.
They Planned to make changes to them
Replace the Articles of Confederation with an entirely new document(apex)
Constitutional Convention
Replace the Articles of Confederation with an entirely new document(apex)
the articles of confederation should remain intact!
To modify the articles of confederation(see "Philadelphia Convention" Wikipedia) To modify the articles of confederation(see "Philadelphia Convention" Wikipedia)
Replace the Articles of Confederation with an entirely new document(apex)
To amend the Articles of Confederation
Delegates meet at that Constitutional Convention to amend the Articles of Confederation.