0
A historical argument presents a claim based on evidence from historical sources and research. It aims to explain and interpret past events, often analyzing the causes and consequences of historical events or developments. Effective historical arguments are supported by strong evidence and critical analysis.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is an historical argument?
A historical argument is a reasoned interpretation or analysis of historical events, typically supported by evidence from primary and secondary sources. It involves constructing a narrative or thesis based on research and critical thinking to explain past events and their significance. Historical arguments can vary in complexity and focus, addressing specific questions or debates within the field of history.
Which word describes Haimon's feelings as he leaves his father after their argument?
Haimon likely feels conflicted, hurt, and frustrated as he leaves his father after their argument. He may also feel disappointed and misunderstood.
What describes an argument?
An argument is a set of statements or propositions put forth as reasons for accepting a conclusion. It involves presenting evidence or reasoning to support a specific claim or viewpoint. Arguments are used to persuade others and to justify a position or belief.
What does a argument beyond mean in a DBQ?
In a DBQ (Document-Based Question), an argument beyond means taking the information provided in the documents and using it to form an original thesis or hypothesis that goes beyond just summarizing the content. This type of argument demonstrates critical thinking and the ability to analyze historical events or trends in a broader context.
What phrase best describes a thesis?
A speaker's use of language to convince an audience
Which of The following best describes a historical argument?
A explanation for why a past event happened apex
Which term describes a clearly stated argument supporting a particular point of view?
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
What does a historian typically do immediately after forming a historical question?
Begin developing a historical argument to answer the historical question
What term describes a clearly stated argument supporting a particular point of view?
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
What is sound and unsound?
It describes two kinds of argument in logic. A sound argument is valid (logically coherent) and its premises are true. And unsound argument is not sound.
Which term describes an argument that has not yet been proven?
An argument that has not been proven is a theory or a claim.
A popular event in North Carolina is a historical play What are the adjectives in this sentence?
popular is an adjective that describes event and historical is the adjective that describes play
What student develops a historical argument to support a thesis she uses the following graphic organizer to structure her argument. which answer choice could be the students thesis?
Answer is a
What correctly describes Hamilton's argument supporting establishment of a national bank?
Yes
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports.
What best describes an argument against public authorities?
They are governed by people not elected by voters.
Which historical term describes the specific primary and secondary sources that historians use to support their claims?
Historical evidence.
