Want this question answered?
Novanet------> ordered foreign companies to leave Africa.
Nobody turned to a classless stateless society based on production for use.
Because they associated capitalism with colonial rule and thought that socialism was more in line with native African traditions.At the time a number of African Countries ceased being European colonies and became independent, they became independent of socialist nations. They chose the government of their mother country.Frequently, since they did not have a tradition of self government, they chose to use the book Leviathan by Thomas Hobbs. This made the president an emperor.
The leaders gathered at the conference.The leaders of the local tribes turned up for the wedding.
When he turned 18.
Neither. And this is actually an impossible comparison to make. Robert Mugabe has destroyed the economy of Zimbabwe and turned a formerly prosperous nation into a corrupt dictatorship, where people have no rights. Barack Obama is not African. He is the son of an African father, but he was born in the United States and is an American, so he does not have any control over what leaders in Africa do. Further, political rhetoric on talk shows aside, Mr. Obama is not a corrupt and brutal dictator, and Americans have plenty of rights and many opportunities to agree or disagree with him (or with any president).
Neither. And this is actually an impossible comparison to make. Robert Mugabe has destroyed the economy of Zimbabwe and turned a formerly prosperous nation into a corrupt dictatorship, where people have no rights. Barack Obama is not African. He is the son of an African father, but he was born in the United States and is an American, so he does not have any control over what leaders in Africa do. Further, political rhetoric on talk shows aside, Mr. Obama is not a corrupt and brutal dictator, and Americans have plenty of rights and many opportunities to agree or disagree with him (or with any president).
Labor unions
the congo.
America and its allies it was with Iran but turned when the economy broke
Eventually, the poor turned to the leaders who promised to improve there lives. They used their soldiers to throw the oligarchy's out of power.
No, he was against the idea of capitalism and in favor of socialism. Ironically, when the Russian economy failed after the Russian Civil War, Lenin turned to aspects of capitalism in his New Economic Policy in order to improve the economy. Most other Bolsheviks were dead set against the NEP.