answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

their economic potential for American trading profits

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What did American imperialists who advocated acquisition of the Philippines stress?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

American imperialist who advocated acquisition of the Philippines especially stressed?

They especially stressed their economic potential for American businessmen seeking trade with China and other Asian nations.


What group battled against American colonization of the Philippines?

anti- imperialists


What is the differences between the imperialists and anti-imperialists debate over Philippines?

Imperialists believed in the US maintaining control over the Philippines to bring civilization and stability, while anti-imperialists argued against US expansionism and believed in self-determination for the Filipino people. Imperialists viewed the Philippines as a strategic asset and gateway to trade in the Pacific, while anti-imperialists saw it as a violation of American values and principles.


The most immediate consequence of the American acquisition of the Philippines?

The Philippine American War.


Why was the acquisition of the Philippines controversial to Americans?

The Acquisition of the Philippines was controversial because of the Insular Cases, that made the people of Puerto Rico American citizens, but did not give them all the rights of an American citizen.


What was the most immediate consequence of the American acquisition of the Philippines?

The Philippine Insurrection, also called the Philippine-American War.


Why did anti-imperialists oppose U.S. expansion?

They believed that expansion went against American ideals.


What is the differences between the imperialists and anti-imperialists?

Although there are plenty of differences, the main differing belief was over territorial expansion. The imperialists were all for it, thinking that it would help with the American market and the depressed economy from the Panic of 1893. The anti-imperialists argued that it went against our American democracy and was harmful to the territories we were trying to acquire.


Would the American public today condone the expansion of the US territory that occurred during the Spanish-American War?

The American public today would probably approve of the US acquisition of Guam and Puerto Rico, but not the Philippines.


Why did the American anti imperialists?

The league argued that Imperialism went against American principles


What were some of the short term and long term results of the American Acquisition of the Philippines and Puerto Rico?

Short term effects: - Puerto Rico used as a military outpost -Filipinos wanted freedom, but annexing them would go against the Declaration of Independence -US played up possible trade profits with the Philippines -Angered Anti-imperialists Long term effects: -Puerto Ricans were granted US citizenship -Great amounts of Puerto Ricans moved to New York City -More cultural diversity


What were some of the short term and long term results of American acquisition of the Philippines and Puerto Rico?

Don't cheat at History. Short term effects: - Puerto Rico used as a military outpost -Filipinos wanted freedom, but annexing them would go against the Declaration of Independence -US played up possible trade profits with the Philippines -Angered Anti-imperialists Long term effects: -Puerto Ricans were granted US citizenship -Great amounts of Puerto Ricans moved to New York City -More cultural diversity