They really didn't do anything for Rhodesia after the UDI. They broke up the union to which Rhodesia was a party to, and in a way forced Rhodesia's hand towards the UDI, then they embargoed the country, then the Conservative government of Margaret Thatcher reneged on their promise to support Muzorewa if he was elected in a free election (which he was), instead insisting on the treaty which eventually put Mugabe into power, thus resulting in the sad state of affairs which is now known as Zimbabwe.
Lancaster Agreement officially turning Rhodesia-Zimbabwe to a british colony.
Zambia was Northern Rhodesia, a colony of Great Britain.
South Rhodesia officially gained its independence from Britain on April 18, 1980 and became the Republic of Zimbabwe.
No. -Zambia is an independent country. When it was Northern Rhodesia it was colonised by Great Britain.
The United States (1776) and Southern Rhodesia (1965) are two examples.
It means 'the land named after Rhodes'. Cecil Rhodes (1853 - 1902) conquered the lands later named Rhodesia and (since 1980) Zimbabwe for Great Britain in the First and Second Matabele Wars.
It had no official name before Rhodesia.
There is no "New Rhodesia" , nor has there ever been. Zambia was previously Northern Rhodesia.
Great Britain colonised both Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia ) and Nyasaland (now Malawi).
Zimbabwe as Zimbabwe belonged to no other country. Zimbabwe as Rhodesia was a colony of Great Britain.
The name Zambia had before independence was Northern Rhodesia. The territory has had various names as the Colonial boundaries shifted around (it was part of Nyasaland at one point) - but Northern Rhodesia is probably the answer you want.
Northern Rhodesia is now Zambia. Southern Rhodesia is now Zimbabwe.