We have no firm evidence that Nero had any interest at all in the Christians. However, later Christian tradition holds that Peter and Paul were martyred in Rome during his reign, Christians were fed to the lions, and the Chistians living in Rome were blamed for the Great Fire of Rome. On each of these traditions, in turn:
So, there is no evidence that Nero instituted the practice of sacrificing Christians at the games, or even that there were many early Christian martyrs at all. It seems that the tradition of widespread Christian martyrdoms in the early Roman Empire developed long after his time. Certainly, Suetonius does record, "Punishment was meted out to the Christians, a class of men professing a new and wicked superstition", so no doubt there were some punishments of some sort incurred.
On this evidence, some Christians were punished, probably unjustly. However, Warnington (Nero Reality and Legend) points out "No other writer, Christian or pagan, in the following centuries refers to Nero using the Christians as scapegoats, although Christian tradition knew of Nero as a persecutor ..." G. Walter discusses the possibility that part of the reference in Annals is a later 'pious interpolation' by Christian apologists.
He persecuted them and a lot of them were killed. However, Nero did not "persecute" them for being Christians, as later emperors did. He punished them for arson, which was a capitol offense in ancient Rome. As soon as all the excitement died down, the Christians were free to practice their religion as before.
Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.
It is likely that the early Christians in Rome were not popular amongst the ordinary people, or the elite. The Roman were proud of their devotion to the traditional gods: they thought that the gods particularly favoured them, giving them victory in their wars, because the Romans were so "pious." The provocation for the first official persecution of Christians in Rome, according to the Roman historian Tacitus, was that Emperor Nero blamed the Christians for starting the fire of Rome. Tacitus thought that Nero did this in order to deflect criticism from himself. From Tacitus' account the attacks on the Christians continued from here to be a major pogrom against the Christians in the city. Tacitus lamented that Nero's attack came to be seen as Nero's folly, and resulted in the Christians gaining sympathy from the ordinary citizens of Rome.
There were no emperors persecuting the Christians in 64 AD. This is a misconception. 64 was the year of the Great Fire of Rome and the emperor Nero was in power. Nero did not persecute the Christians for their religion. Nero punished the Christians for the crime of arson. After the outrage died down, the Christians were free to worship as they saw fit.
Nero prosecuted the Christians after the Grreat Fire of Rome in 64 AD.
According to the story, the Christians were used as scapegoats because of accusations that Nero had started the great fire of Rome
Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.Take your pick, either Nero or the Christians were blamed for the burning of Rome.
It is likely that the early Christians in Rome were not popular amongst the ordinary people, or the elite. The Roman were proud of their devotion to the traditional gods: they thought that the gods particularly favoured them, giving them victory in their wars, because the Romans were so "pious." The provocation for the first official persecution of Christians in Rome, according to the Roman historian Tacitus, was that Emperor Nero blamed the Christians for starting the fire of Rome. Tacitus thought that Nero did this in order to deflect criticism from himself. From Tacitus' account the attacks on the Christians continued from here to be a major pogrom against the Christians in the city. Tacitus lamented that Nero's attack came to be seen as Nero's folly, and resulted in the Christians gaining sympathy from the ordinary citizens of Rome.
It is likely that the early Christians in Rome were not popular amongst the ordinary people, or the elite. The Roman were proud of their devotion to the traditional gods: they thought that the gods particularly favoured them, giving them victory in their wars, because the Romans were so "pious." The provocation for the first official persecution of Christians in Rome, according to the Roman historian Tacitus, was that Emperor Nero blamed the Christians for starting the fire of Rome. Tacitus thought that Nero did this in order to deflect criticism from himself. From Tacitus' account the attacks on the Christians continued from here to be a major pogrom against the Christians in the city. Tacitus lamented that Nero's attack came to be seen as Nero's folly, and resulted in the Christians gaining sympathy from the ordinary citizens of Rome.
There were no emperors persecuting the Christians in 64 AD. This is a misconception. 64 was the year of the Great Fire of Rome and the emperor Nero was in power. Nero did not persecute the Christians for their religion. Nero punished the Christians for the crime of arson. After the outrage died down, the Christians were free to worship as they saw fit.
Nero prosecuted the Christians after the Grreat Fire of Rome in 64 AD.
Nero was said to have persecuted the Christians as a scapegoat because there were accusations that he started the Great Fire of Rome in 64. Some modern historians doubt this. It this was the case, the Christians would not have been friends with Nero.
According to the story, the Christians were used as scapegoats because of accusations that Nero had started the great fire of Rome
Nero was the emperor who fed to the lions, burned alive, and crucified Christians of the early church. He was also emperor when Rome burned to the ground.
The Great Fire of Rome began in the Christian quarter of the city, and Emperor Nero believed the Christians had started the fire. Because of this, and to appear to the angry population that he was doing something, he expelled the Christians from Rome.
The Roman Government began persecuting Christians under Emperor Nero. Nero began to execute large numbers of Christians following the Great Fire of Rome. According to the Roman historian Tacitus, the population searched for a scapegoat and rumors held Nero responsible. To deflect blame, Nero targeted Christians.
The Roman Government began persecuting Christians under Emperor Nero. Nero began to execute large numbers of Christians following the Great Fire of Rome. According to the Roman historian Tacitus, the population searched for a scapegoat and rumors held Nero responsible. To deflect blame, Nero targeted Christians.
No. Nero is best remembered for the great fire of Rome and his prosecution of the Christians for arson.