Want this question answered?
Socrates taught him
Socrates said that his teachings were good for Athens because they forced people to think about their values and actions. The jury disagreed and condemned him to death. He died by hemlock, a slow-acting poison.
Socrates said that his teachings were good for Athens because they forced people to think about their values and actions. The jury disagreed and condemned him to death. He died by hemlock, a slow-acting poison.
Not 100% sure here, but I think the goal of Socrates was to learn the truth whatever it may be, good or bad, while Sophistry was the art of winning an argument for a "truth" which was already in acceptance.
Yes, relativists believe that there is no "true" good or bad just what people believe to be good or bad. Where as Socrates believes there is absolute good and bad.
Teaching people to think for themselves, and live a good and virtuous life.
Socrates taught him
Socrates said that his teachings were good for Athens because they forced people to think about their values and actions. The jury disagreed and condemned him to death. He died by hemlock, a slow-acting poison.
Socrates said that his teachings were good for Athens because they forced people to think about their values and actions. The jury disagreed and condemned him to death. He died by hemlock, a slow-acting poison.
One of the most important qualities a leader can have is good communication. Without good communication their message will be lost.
Thinking about others is what is important in life because it would not be fun to think about yourself all the time so why have not think about others especially if it is to do some good in this world we are living in.
Molly Ivans. And, much earlier: Gautama, the Buddha. He called Ignorance Avijja. Earlier than that, was Socrates. Socrates believed that the means to the good life (summum bonum = the ultimate good) was a beautiful, or virtuous soul. His argument is that we choose evil because we think it will be good for us. We rob the bank because we think more money will be good for us. But to Socrates, robbing the bank taints your soul. We sin because we are ignorant of the real means to a good life - virtue. To Socrates, there would be no evil if everyone realized that virtue is the only means to the good life. If we could stick together the end and the means - there would be no evil.
Not 100% sure here, but I think the goal of Socrates was to learn the truth whatever it may be, good or bad, while Sophistry was the art of winning an argument for a "truth" which was already in acceptance.
Socrates was a good person but a lot of people thought he was a bad person
Yes, relativists believe that there is no "true" good or bad just what people believe to be good or bad. Where as Socrates believes there is absolute good and bad.
Socrates Every person has a soul that llives on for ever, and in order to make your soul rightouse you must be a good person. It is not living that matters, but living rightly. When on trial for corrupting minds of the youth, he Sid that they were wrong heade and they were focusing on their career, and familys whie they should be focused on the welfare of their souls Cant go against the will of the comunity What would the community think, would they agree, is it wrong, is it morally right Socrates believed wrongdoing was a consequence of ignorance and those who did wrong knew no better. He believed that it is necessary to do what one thinks is right, even when faced with a universal opposition
Socrates did not have an explicit creed to which he was attached. What he did have, however, like the rest of us, were certain operating principles that could be thought of as a kind of creed. He had one principle that was his most important. According to Plato, he stated it at his trial: "the unexamined life is not worth living" [APOLOGY, 38a]. To examine life is to put it to the test, to seek how to live it better. Socrates was a philosopher, and the word "philosopher" simply means "lover of wisdom." Therefore, Socrates seriously tried to live as wisely as he could, and he recommended that everyone else do the same. He believed that "a good man cannot be harmed either in life or in death" [APOLOGY 41d]. He thought of his principle task as that of being a good man. Since it is not obvious how to be a good person, he adopted the philosophic life in order to do his best to become a good person.