Best Answer

The Kalamazoo Case of 1874 set a precedent that taxing citizens for secondary education (post elementary school) was legal.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What did The Kalamazoo Case 1874 set a legal precedent for?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Related questions

What term describes a ruling in an earlier legal case that is similar to a current case?


Stuart v School District No 1 of Village of Kalamazoo?

1.8 Kalamazoo Case of 1874Another historical event that altered the course of education occurred in the latter partof the nineteenth century in Kalamazoo, Michigan. The "Kalamazoo Case of 1874," as itis popularly known, established a legal system of taxation for funding secondary education.As was indicated earlier in this chapter, taxation had been approved over two hundredyears earlier for elementary education in Massachusetts. The decision rendered by theMichigan Supreme Court in the Kalamazoo Case of 1874 established the same taxingbasis for public high schools as had existed for public elementary schools.8 This now-famous case inaugurated the concept of funding high schools on an equal basis with elementary schools.

What legal precedent does the California vs Acevedo case have?

ladies twerked

What is the definition of the term test case?

The term of "Test Case" is a legal term. A test case is a legal case which sets precedent for other cases which have the same question of law involved.

Which description applies to a landmark case?

In many countries a landmark case sets a legal precedent and is embodied into law

Which description applies to landmark case?

In many countries a landmark case sets a legal precedent and is embodied into law

Whwt is meant by judicial precedent?

Judicial precedent refers to a legal case that establishes a principle or rule that can be applied by other court or other judicial body

Did the Jeffrey Dahmer case result in an important legal precedent?

Legal precedent is an existing legal ruling. It comes from case law, or past judicial decisions and cases. Precedent is binding, unless overturned by a higher court. I don't think no lawyer will find Dahmer's case useful establishing a legal case using a principle or rule that a court or other judicial body may utilize when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts unless the lawyer is seeking Life imprisonment in a case were a death sentence is more probable.

What a precedent is and how it relates to interpreting law?

Precedent, in legal terms, is the decision of judges in similar court cases to yours. If there is a previous case that is similar with a decision, the judge must follow the precedent unless the facts are distinguishable.

What is a decision in a case that sets forth a new legal principle establishing a precedent?

Ratio decidendi sets forth the legal reasoning for the decision in a case. (Obiter dictum is a judicial opinion or incidental comment that is not legally binding.)

An earlier court decision that guides judges decisions in later cases?

A precedent is a principle or rule that was established in a previous legal case. Precedent is used in cases with similar facts and background. The use of precedent allows for stability in common law rulings.

When does it mean a judge follows a legal precedent?

"Precedent" means "that which comes before". In making an interpretation of the law, judges will examine the decisions of judges who decided similar cases. If the case is sufficiently similar (the legal term for this is "on point"), the judge will adopt the reasoning of the earlier judge. This is called following a precedent.