Yes, Aristarchus of Samos discovered that the earth revolves around the sun.
Aristarchus of Samoa showed the first known model that placed the Sun at the centre of the known Universe.
Since the Earth is rotating, and moving through space, and the rock is moving along with the Earth, then it does, but relative to the Earth, I'd say that the momentum of the rock (mass * velocity) is essentially zero.
The length of a year (orbit) for Mercury is 88 Earth days, about 1/4 that of Earth. The planet spins 1.5 times during that period, about once every 58.7 Earth days. The combination of these motions results in a "solar day" (sunrise to sunrise) of 176 Earth days, or exactly twice as long as the year. So you could say that a Mercury year is only half of a Mercury solar day.
It all depends on where you're standing. On Earth, you can see only one side of the Moon, so you can say that the Moon does NOT rotate relative to Earth. BUT as you watch the Moon all month long, you can see that different parts of it are Sun-lit at different times, so you can also say that the Moon DOES rotate relative to the Sun. Earth definitely rotates with respect to both Moon and Sun. As for 'rotating with each other', no; they both REVOLVE together around the Sun, but they can never ROTATE together. Rotation is a ball spinning, and revolution is the ball's path around a larger, heavier ball. Since the Earth and Moon are two separate balls, each has its own rotation, but they can both share revolution around the Sun.
somebody find out relative and I'll tell absolute and don't just say I'm working on it because that's not the right answer
Aristarchus of Samoa showed the first known model that placed the Sun at the centre of the known Universe.
air-is-tar-kus
Earth goes under millions of motions - itself, the pull of the moon, orbiting the sun, which orbits a galaxy where the stars change position all the time, and the galaxy is still stretching. Now why millions? Because everything has its own gravity, no matter how small, and can affect in even the slightest bit to our orbit. So, I should say billions. Now, for those who think that answer is wrong, take this one then: Relative to the sun, 2.
An object is in motion if it changes position relative to a reference point. Motion is a relative quantity and is expressed in respect to the position of another object. Example: both a car and the Earth are moving (earth is revolving around the sun) but if we express the motion of the car in respect to the Earth, we say the car is moving relative to the Earth. At the same time the earth is moving relative to the sun.
The first person (that we know of!) to say that the Sun is in the center of our solar system and that the Earth goes around the Sun was Aristarchus of Samos, a Greek astronomer and mathematician about 2400 years ago.
When considering how 'fast' something is moving on earth, you ignore the fact that the earth itself is rotating, that the earth is orbiting the sun, and that the solar system itself is moving through the universe. All you care about is the relative motion between the object, and the earth itself, or another object perhaps.
All motion is relative. The question "is this object moving?" is in fact meaningless unless we specify "moving relative to what other object". Similarly, there is no such thing as "absolute rest": it's just as true to say that the road is moving at 50 km/h relative to your car as it is to say that your car is moving at 50 km/h relative to the road.
Since the Earth is rotating, and moving through space, and the rock is moving along with the Earth, then it does, but relative to the Earth, I'd say that the momentum of the rock (mass * velocity) is essentially zero.
It depends on your frame of reference. The earth travels around the sun. The sun travels around the centre of the Milky Way Galaxy and takes the earth along with it. So the earth travels at the combined speed of those two motions. But then, the Milky Way Galaxy rotates around the centre of our local cluster and takes the Sun and the earth along with it. So the earth travels at the combined speed of those three motions Our local galactic cluster is not static, so ... And so on. Where do you stop and say this is the fixed point of reference against which I will measure the speed of the earth?
While many say it was capernicus I think it was actually " Aristarchus" a couple hundred years before Capernicus.
Because the relative is related to him/her
While many say it was capernicus I think it was actually " Aristarchus" a couple hundred years before Capernicus.