0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did the political parties react to the compromise of 1850?
Both parties were satisfied with the Compromise of 1850.
Were both parties satisfied by the compromise of 1850?
yes because they both had all they wanted for states
What does the legal term Accord and Satisfaction refer to?
Accord and Satisfaction refers to when there is a dispute between two parties, both parties compromise to reach a settlement that is acceptable to both parties.
When are lawyers needed?
when both the parties don't compromise, or rich enough to feed lawyer.
What is considered to be a compromise?
This is a strange question. However, it seems like the question that is meant to be asked is what compromise means. The word compromise means that both parties consent to an agreement.
How was the Bill of Rights a compromise?
Federalists were in favor of the Constitution but anti-federalists were not because they were in fear of losing their rights. Congress included the Bill of Rights as a compromise to satisfy both parties. The compromise is commonly called the "Massachusetts Compromise"
What is the difference between compromise and collaboration?
The words both involve two or more parties, but the difference between compromise and collaboration is that when you compromise, the two parties are coming to an agreement to solve a problem, whereas, a collaboration is a product produced by more than one party. Technically, all compromises are collaborations since they involve two or more parties.
How do you solve disputes at meetings?
both parties need to compromise/build a bridge agree to disagree take turns giving in
What is Clinton's nationality?
Both Clintons, Bill and Hillary, have US nationality.
What are effects of political deadlock?
When a political deadlock is reached, both parties are forced to find common ground to work out a compromise. Working out a compromise sounds much more successful to me than diggin in on positions and getting nowhere.
What did the Lytton commission decide about the Manchurian incident?
found both parties guilty. japan for being the aggressor but china also for the refusal to compromise and the anti-japoanese propaganda
Was the development of the political parties necessary why or why not?
I found it unnecessary because instead of being divided into two separate groups, they could have found a compromise and both agreed to the terms.
