Slave rebellions.
depends. Plantation owners had slaves ranging from 20 to 100s. home owners had slaves as servants ranging from 1 to 3. the armies too had slaves. the number of slaves owned depended on the needs of the owners.
Plantation owners were usually the most wealthy people in their area so they did tend to own the most land and slaves
because indentured servants were on a contract and got payed and slaves they got to keep forever. plus they saved more money cause they didnt pay slaves.
mainly rich plantation owners
I have no clue, i think got slaves to do the work
they coulld use slaves longer
Slave rebellions
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property for life, providing a long-term and inexpensive source of labor. Indentured servants, on the other hand, only worked for a fixed period and were entitled to freedom and land after their contract ended, making them less profitable for plantation owners in the long run.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property, providing a long-term source of labor with no freedom or rights. Slaves could be inherited and their children born into slavery, ensuring a continuous workforce. In contrast, indentured servants had limited terms of service and some legal protections, making them less profitable and reliable for plantation owners.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property and could be bought, sold, and inherited, providing a more permanent and stable labor force. Slaves were also seen as a lifetime investment whereas indentured servants were temporary workers whose contracts would expire. Additionally, slaves were often treated as less than human and did not have legal rights or protections, allowing plantation owners to exert complete control over them.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a lifelong source of labor, whereas indentured servants typically worked for a set period before gaining their freedom. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing plantation owners with a greater sense of control and power. Additionally, the racial hierarchy of the time made slaves a more socially acceptable form of labor exploitation.
depends. Plantation owners had slaves ranging from 20 to 100s. home owners had slaves as servants ranging from 1 to 3. the armies too had slaves. the number of slaves owned depended on the needs of the owners.
Slaves cost much less: to buy and to care for than indentured servants.
Having white servants as well as slaves
By denying them privileges granted to indentured servants
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered lifelong property with no legal rights or protections, ensuring a cheap and permanent labor force. Slaves also provided a better return on investment over time compared to indentured servants, who were temporary and could eventually gain freedom and become competition in the labor market.
English settlers African slaves, rich English plantation owners, English inductered servants