it was really hard fopr them.
Religious believers think that healthy living is important because if you are not healthy, it could couse many problems, such as diseases.
I should say defiantly not! There are few in the world and appear only to believers. There are not many people who dream as much any more, so killing one would minimize the amount even more. It is also animal cruelty, and I think it would give you bad luck for killing one.
Because they think killing/sacrificing lambs is funny.
The "comfort" of a life after death as well as the "comfort" of someone watching over them and keeping them safe has attracted many people to the idea of religion.
its very logical...only blind people cant see that drugs and other stupid things destroy your life.
Some religions believe sex is a sin and the believers think it is best to stay celibate. A religious believer might agree with being celibate because some religions teach that sex is a sin.
Believers as in (christians)...believe that there is a God. And they believe that He made ALL things, including man. There are many different religions though. Depends on what you call believers. Yes, in three senses: First, the general order and regulation of the natural world (e.g. elegant, immutable physical laws, species reproducing after kind, complex interdependencies between things) argue for the concept of an intelligent designer. Second, the preservation or "perseverance" of the natural world (cyclical geological and biological renewal, persistent order rather than descent into chaos) argues for the concept of a benevolent sustainer. Third, the innate, universal religiosity of world cultures argues for a single, ancient anthropological point of origin. Of course, rationalistic believers can and do draw opposite conclusions given the same data; but the original question, whether religious believers can be justified in what they think about origins from observing natural phenomena demands an unequivocal "yes."
because people keep killing them
Some believers may have found "The Da Vinci Code" upsetting due to its fictional portrayal of historical and religious figures. However, it is important to remember that the movie is a work of fiction and not meant to be taken as a factual representation of religious beliefs. It is always encouraged to approach movies with a critical mindset and separate fact from fiction.
I personally think that there are more non believers than believers.
Human have 1 thing that an animal doesn't and could never have and thats a Brain (Mind) , because of minds human are greater then animals So it is right to think that human are better then animals
Not just religious believers... I'm an atheist - and even I believe that - unless there's some serious medical condition that needs coping with in a medical setting - the elderly should be cared for by their relatives at home ! Far too many older people are simply 'dumped' on an already over-stretched health service by their families - and abandoned to end their days rotting in a hospital bed !