They would have played games, socialised, looked after their master's children. It would have depended if they were allowed privileges such as these.
Slaves do not have fun. They are slaves and are people owned by another person.
Roman slaves were prisoner of wars from the battles the Romans fought. Nearer the end of the Roman empire there were less battles so there was a short supply of slaves. they were ROMAN SLAVES!
Slaves
Yes, Roman women could both buy and sell slaves.Yes, Roman women could both buy and sell slaves.Yes, Roman women could both buy and sell slaves.Yes, Roman women could both buy and sell slaves.Yes, Roman women could both buy and sell slaves.Yes, Roman women could both buy and sell slaves.Yes, Roman women could both buy and sell slaves.Yes, Roman women could both buy and sell slaves.Yes, Roman women could both buy and sell slaves.
yes 1 person could have up 2 about 400 slaves
A Roman slaves role was to do his/her job. Slaves were the property of their owners and did the work or job that they were suited for.
Slaves did everything.
With the exception of working in mineral extraction Roman slaves probably had it better. A Roman slave could earn his freedom or advance himself which was not the case with plantation slaves in the deep south.
Uh, no. :[
no
A Roman used slaves becaue they thought if they did not use a slave, people would laugh at them
they were very important in roman times
broads
Slaves were property, like cattle.
As with slavery in general, Roman slaves were not paid. They were required to work as needed by their owners regardless of their wishes.
Hi Roman slaves were sold in the streets. i leart this last year when i went to haidrens wall.
Class- wise the slaves were at the bottom of Roman society. In the pecking order of the slaves, the ones who worked in the mines were at the bottom of slave society.Class- wise the slaves were at the bottom of Roman society. In the pecking order of the slaves, the ones who worked in the mines were at the bottom of slave society.Class- wise the slaves were at the bottom of Roman society. In the pecking order of the slaves, the ones who worked in the mines were at the bottom of slave society.Class- wise the slaves were at the bottom of Roman society. In the pecking order of the slaves, the ones who worked in the mines were at the bottom of slave society.Class- wise the slaves were at the bottom of Roman society. In the pecking order of the slaves, the ones who worked in the mines were at the bottom of slave society.Class- wise the slaves were at the bottom of Roman society. In the pecking order of the slaves, the ones who worked in the mines were at the bottom of slave society.Class- wise the slaves were at the bottom of Roman society. In the pecking order of the slaves, the ones who worked in the mines were at the bottom of slave society.Class- wise the slaves were at the bottom of Roman society. In the pecking order of the slaves, the ones who worked in the mines were at the bottom of slave society.Class- wise the slaves were at the bottom of Roman society. In the pecking order of the slaves, the ones who worked in the mines were at the bottom of slave society.
On days off slaves mended and mad houses, pots and pans.Slaves didn't do much for fun but sometimes they organised social gatherings and dances.
The plantation.
they were
On the plantation.
yes
no
Whips
Yes they did keep slaves if you want to check go to http:/www.unrv.com/culture /roman-slavery.php