0
The 23rd Amendment gave the District of Columbia the right to vote for the President. It was Ratified March 29, 1961.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who pushed for the 23rd amendment?
The citizens of the District of Columbia assisted by (numerically) a large number of Democrat lawmakers who wished to bring the majority Democrat-voting citizenry into Congress to give the Democrat Party another voting member.
What did the 23rd amendment accomplish?
The 23rd Amendment, Ratified March 29,1961, allows United States citizens who live in the District of Columbia to vote for Electors for President and Vice President. Prior to this amendment, citizens who live in Washington, D.C. were unable to vote for the President or Vice President because D.C. is not a state. Washington D.C is restricted to the number of electors in the least populated state. They are still unable to elect voting representatives to congress.
What rights does the 23rd amendment give you?
The 23rd amendment permitted Washington DC to choose electors for President and Vice PresidentTHIS IS NOT THE ANSWER...I GOT IT WRONG ON MY PAPER AFTER USING THIS !!
Why did Maryland give its land to the US?
For the creation of the District of Columbia.
How does the 26th amendment still affect us today?
23rd Amendment gives votes to citizens of District of Columbia. Despite the small size, there are plenty of people living in that area, but come election time they were disenfranchised because they could not vote. 23rd Amendment partially fixes this problem by giving them 2 electoral votes. However, this still presents a problem because they still can't choose a representative. If you're living outside of District of Columbia, this Amendment may not have a big impact in your life. But for those living in DC, they can finally participate in the formal process, even if they are not directly represented by a representative. This Amendment also raises issues of whether or not we should make DC into a state, which would give them more representation in the government.
Why do some territories of the us vote and others not vote?
Some territories of the US, such as Puerto Rico and Guam, do not have the same voting rights as states because they are classified as unincorporated territories. While residents of these territories are US citizens, they do not have the same representation in Congress or the ability to vote in presidential elections. This is due to historical and legal factors that have shaped the relationship between the territories and the federal government.
Why was the 23rd amendment important?
Twenty Third Amendment does is to give votes for President and Vice President in the Electoral College to the District of Columbia which equals the least number of votes that any State could have.
What is the criterion for the number of votes each state has to give to their candidates?
A State's electoral votes are equal to its combined number of Senators and Representatives. Since every State has two Senators and at least one Representative, this number can never be less than three. The District of Columbia is entitled (23rd Amdt) to "The number of electors which it would have if it were a State, but in no event more than the least populous State", ie three.
I would like to take free classes on preparing federal and district of columbia income tax. Please give me locations in the district of columbia and no online courses?
you can file for free online and the programs guide you on what to imput so is easy. http://www.irs.gov/efile/article/0,,id=118986,00.html I would like take tax classe in washington area.Please help me for the adress.
Which amendment give Congress the constitutional authority to levy income taxes?
Sixteenth Amendment (Amendment XVI)
Which amendment says the government has to give fair price for property?
amendment 25
What was the ruling in US v Nixon 1974?
United States v. Nixon, 418 US 683 (1974)The court of original jurisdiction in this case was US District Court for the District of Columbia, presided over by Judge John Sirica.The Judge approved Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski's subpoena on the grounds that neither Executive Privilege nor Separation of Powers between the branches of government were sufficient to abrogate the six accused conspirators' constitutional rights under the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause and the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause. Nixon was ordered to give Jaworski the tapes.Nixon appealed the decision directly to the US Supreme Court, bypassing the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, so there was no intermediate appellate ruling in this case. The Supreme Court ultimately affirmed Sirica's ruling.(Sirica was Time Magazine's Man of the Year in 1973)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
