answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What did the California supreme court rule for the victim in the rehearing of the tarasoff case?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

In the 1976 rehearing of the Tarasoff case California supreme court called for what for the victim?

duty to warn


What is a tarasoff warning?

A Tarasoff warning is where a mental health professional is required to warn of a credible danger to a reasonably identifiable victim. It was derived from the 1976 case Tarasoff v. Regents UC Berkeley.


What is the law behind Tarasoff vs Board of Regents of the university of California?

The Case of Tatiana Tarasoff vs California Board of Regents October 27, 1969 Tatiana Tarasoff was killed by Prosenjit Poddar a foreign exchange student at the University of California at Berkley. Paddar had pursued a romantic relationship with Tarasoff, who repeatedly rejected his advances Paddar sought treatment at the schools health facility and was assigned to a clinical psychologist who diagnosed him with paranoid schizophrenia. Paddar spoke about his anger and rage at Tarasoff and explained his plans to kill her. The psychologist found his threats to be substantiated and could (through deduction) identify the potential victim. He consulted two psychiatrists who also examined Poddar and concurred with the finding. They initiated civil commitment procedures, however the chief of psychiatry at the Cowell Memorial Hospital countermanded the findings and instructed staff to release Poddar. His therapist then made a report to campus police. The police issued a "pick up" order for Paddar. He was found and questioned. The police, determined that he was not a risk and let him go after he agreed to stay away from Tarasoff. Poddar discontinued his therapy. Two months later, Poddar committed the murder of Tatiana Tarasoff after she rejected him once more. Tarasoff's parents sued the university, the therapist, and the police for negligence. The case went to the California Supreme Court who found that the defendents were negligent in not notifying Tarasoff that she had been the subject of a homicidal threat (although Poddar never specifically mentioned her by name). Specifically, the court ruled that the therapist is liable if (1) they should have known about the dangerousness based on accepted professional standards of conduct,and (2) they failed to exercise reasonable care in warning the potential victim. Tarasoff's parents won a civil award of $600,000 (3 million + in 2000 dollars). One half of the settlement was paid by the State of California (School and Police) and the other half was paid by the psychologist (out of pocket) The findings sparked laws in virtually every state to change and include statutory requirements for notification and duty to warn those against whom threats have been made. The debate between rules of confidentiality and privilege and duty to warn has existed ever since.


What is the Terasoff Act?

if you are referring to the landmark Tarasoff case, this is what your answer would be. The Tarasoff Act basically mandates that mental health professionals have a legal duty to protect third parties from the actions of their [professionals'] clients. The professional has a duty to take the necessary steps in warning the intended victim(s), police, and all other reasonably necessary people of the imminent and potential dangers that are posed by the client. Even though the ethical code of confidentiality is breached, the reason for the breach far outweighs and, therefore, justifies the breach.


What Supreme Court case ruled that victim impact statements acceptable at sentencing?

Payne v. Tennessee


What are duties of the a supreme court?

To keep the trial in order and to allow the convict and victim to tell their side of the case.


What are the release dates for The Innocent Victim - 1998?

The Innocent Victim - 1998 was released on: USA: 26 January 1998 (Los Angeles, California)


What is the Statute of limitations on bigamy in California?

The normal limit is 1 year in California. It can be as much as three years if the victim is under 14 years old.


What are the release dates for The Perfect Victim - 2008?

The Perfect Victim - 2008 was released on: USA: 4 October 2008 (Shriekfest Film Festival) USA: 4 October 2008 (Los Angeles, California)


What happens if the alleged victim doesn't show up at the trial for an assault case in California?

Some weed every day :)


Why did Allan Bakke sue in the Regents of the University of California v Bakke case?

Allan Bakke claimed he was a victim of reverse discrimination.


What is a direct victim?

A direct victim is the actual victim of a situation. If a man is beating his wife, she is the direct victim.