answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Allan Bakke claimed he was a victim of reverse discrimination.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did Allan Bakke sue in the Regents of the University of California v Bakke case?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which U.S. Supreme Court decision made it illegal to achieve diversity through the use of racial quotas?

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)


Which supreme court decision struck down the quota system?

Regents of University of California v. Bakke


How did Regents of the University of California v Bakke change affirmative-action programs?

Regents of the University of California vs Bakke affirmed affirmative action by ruling it as entirely constitutional. This allowed for affirmative action programs to have a clear set of laws and regulations regarding their behavior and rights.


What was the US Supreme Court case that declared affirmative action racial quotas unconstitutional?

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke


What court case said racial quota. systems are unconstitutional?

University California vs. Bakke or the bakke case


Who is Allen Bakke?

Allan Bakke was the plaintiff in the famous "reverse discrimination" lawsuit again the University of California at Davis medical school. The case went to the US Supreme Court which found the medical school admission process discriminated against Bakke, and also found that strict quotas were an unlawful way to increase diversity.Case Citation:Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978)


Who won the case of regents v bakke?

Bakke won, he was accepted into the school.


What is university of California regents v. Bakke?

In Bakke v Regents of the University of California, Alan Bakke, who had applied to the University and been rejected, sued the Regents claiming that his civil rights as a white had been denied by the University's policy of affirmative action for non--white applicants. Affirmative action, he argued, violated the Civil RIghts Act of 1964, which forbids racial discrimination by the federal government or any program (such as a state university) that receives federal funding. The Supreme Court held that affirmative action was constitutionally allowed so long as race was only one of several factors taken into account by admissions officers, but that strict quotas that could apply regardless of qualifications violated the law.


What was Bakke v. Regents of the University of California supreme court decision in 1978?

In the 1978 case Bakke v. Regents of the University of California, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the use of racial quotas in college admissions was unconstitutional. The Court also held that affirmative action programs could be used as long as race was not the sole factor in decision making. This decision has had a significant impact on affirmative action policies in education.


What court case said racial quotas are unconstitutional?

University California vs. Bakke or the bakke case


What court case racial quota system are unconstitutional?

University California vs. Bakke or the bakke case


What court said racial quota systems are unconstitutional?

University California vs. Bakke or the bakke case