answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

In Bakke v Regents of the University of California, Alan Bakke, who had applied to the University and been rejected, sued the Regents claiming that his civil rights as a white had been denied by the University's policy of affirmative action for non--white applicants. Affirmative action, he argued, violated the Civil RIghts Act of 1964, which forbids racial discrimination by the federal government or any program (such as a state university) that receives federal funding. The Supreme Court held that affirmative action was constitutionally allowed so long as race was only one of several factors taken into account by admissions officers, but that strict quotas that could apply regardless of qualifications violated the law.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

5d ago

In the 1978 case Bakke v. Regents of the University of California, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the use of racial quotas in college admissions was unconstitutional. The Court also held that affirmative action programs could be used as long as race was not the sole factor in decision making. This decision has had a significant impact on affirmative action policies in education.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was Bakke v. Regents of the University of California supreme court decision in 1978?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which supreme court decision struck down the quota system?

Regents of University of California v. Bakke


Which U.S. Supreme Court decision made it illegal to achieve diversity through the use of racial quotas?

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)


What was the US Supreme Court case that declared affirmative action racial quotas unconstitutional?

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke


What was the supreme courts ruling in the regents of the university of California v bake case of 1978?

The court ruled that the use of racial quotas in college admissions was unconstitutional Source; study island


What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke case of 1978?

The court ruled that the use of racial quotas in college admissions was unconstitutional.


What was the supreme court decision in Fisher v University of Texas?

Texas Ranch


Is a Supreme Court decision permanent?

In most cases a Supreme Court decision is permanent. The current Supreme Court can change the decision of a previous Supreme Court.


What Effect did the Supreme Court decision have on Dartmouth College?

From a private college into a state university under public control.


What is university of California regents v. Bakke?

In Bakke v Regents of the University of California, Alan Bakke, who had applied to the University and been rejected, sued the Regents claiming that his civil rights as a white had been denied by the University's policy of affirmative action for non--white applicants. Affirmative action, he argued, violated the Civil RIghts Act of 1964, which forbids racial discrimination by the federal government or any program (such as a state university) that receives federal funding. The Supreme Court held that affirmative action was constitutionally allowed so long as race was only one of several factors taken into account by admissions officers, but that strict quotas that could apply regardless of qualifications violated the law.


Can you appeal again over the third district appellate court in calif?

Yes. An appeal from a decision of a California Court of Appeal is made to the California Supreme Court.


What is the first major supreme Court case that challenged affirmative action?

University of California v. Bakke


What instigated California's Proposition 8?

Proposition 8 was created in response to a 2008 decision by the Supreme Court of the State of California which ordered the state to permit same-sex couples to marry.