Want this question answered?
They fit into the fur trade by being in it! They traded fur to the Europeans for goods. They got food, goods while the Europeans got there faves...furs from beavers.
It hastened the arrival of Europeans to the interior of Canada. Canada was going to be colonised regardless of the fur trade but some areas of Canada would have been able to put off colonisation for generations if it had not been for the fur trade. Overall though the fur trade may have had more positive than negative. Europeans saw value in having aboriginals that supplied furs. So much so that the British created a company that would set up trading forts along the coast to trade with aboriginals who would trade further inland. That company would have the aboriginals leading traditional lives for as long as furs were delivered to the coast. For the aboriginals it meant access to modern technology and the ability to control contact. But it was that very fur trade that brought others deep inland into Canada and with it colonisation. Then again with or without furs Aboriginals would have had to deal with the many negatives of European contact, namely disease. Disease spread deep inland long before any Europeans showed up. It was these diseases that decimated North American populations and emptied the land of people, long before they got the chance to meet fur traders.
Fur trades were mutually beneficial for both groups of people. Fur was in high demand in Europe, and so Europeans had Native people get animal furs for them to send back to Europe and make lots of money from. Native people in return were given handy things that they had not had before, such as guns, pots and pans, etc. (They were also given things that weren't so great, like smallpox infected blankets. Not good.) Hope that helps!
The first nations helped the Europeans because it was good to trade with them to get metals for fur.
It was cold and the Europians were freezing
The role of the Canadian fur trade was to allow the natives to trade fur pelts for goods, with the europeans.
They fit into the fur trade by being in it! They traded fur to the Europeans for goods. They got food, goods while the Europeans got there faves...furs from beavers.
One of the advantages of the fur trade for Indians was that the Europeans supplied them with rifles. Fur was in high demand in Europe so Europeans were making a lot of profit. A disadvantage of the fur trade for the Europeans was that they had a lot of conflict with each other. A disadvantage for the Indians was that the Europeans took control over the fur trade.
It hastened the arrival of Europeans to the interior of Canada. Canada was going to be colonised regardless of the fur trade but some areas of Canada would have been able to put off colonisation for generations if it had not been for the fur trade. Overall though the fur trade may have had more positive than negative. Europeans saw value in having aboriginals that supplied furs. So much so that the British created a company that would set up trading forts along the coast to trade with aboriginals who would trade further inland. That company would have the aboriginals leading traditional lives for as long as furs were delivered to the coast. For the aboriginals it meant access to modern technology and the ability to control contact. But it was that very fur trade that brought others deep inland into Canada and with it colonisation. Then again with or without furs Aboriginals would have had to deal with the many negatives of European contact, namely disease. Disease spread deep inland long before any Europeans showed up. It was these diseases that decimated North American populations and emptied the land of people, long before they got the chance to meet fur traders.
the dutch, french, and the aboriginals of Canada
the fur trade was a great demand from the Europeans and French people, because the furs are used for fashion .(HATS,,,ETC)
The English fur trade was a long time ago
They made valuable trades with the Europeans. They gave beaver fur away and received other goods such as wool and metal.
fur trade
there is no specific person but...The fur trade began in the 1500's as an exchange between Indians and Europeans.
The French
They traded fur and mostly skills. They had no intention on trading their important goods such as; guns, metals, pots etc.