Want this question answered?
It was/is in human nature.
Because they wanted to find out an alternative route that would allow to bypass the Middle East Muslim countries, avoid the trade monopole of the spices and other valuable goods held by Venice and Genoa and get directly to trade with Japan, China and other East Asia countries.
For the sake of profit and access to raw materials
It allowed countries that did not have necessary items to get them from other countries and those countries gave other things that they had a surplus of.
Songhai traded gold and salt
It was their main source of getting money from other countries and for world trade.
hkhk
Traditionally TRADE with other indians and with Europeans
Yes, Countries can trade with each other without free trade agreement.
One of the advantages of the fur trade for Indians was that the Europeans supplied them with rifles. Fur was in high demand in Europe so Europeans were making a lot of profit. A disadvantage of the fur trade for the Europeans was that they had a lot of conflict with each other. A disadvantage for the Indians was that the Europeans took control over the fur trade.
Countries trade with anything. Money, objects, animals, etc.
Europeans especially wanted to get fine Chinese goods such as silk, tea and pottery. The United Kingdom and other countries used military power to force china trade.
The Europeans would trade silver, wool, and spices with other colonies and tribes. They in return would get animal fur, cotton, pearls, and silk.
we trade with other countries to get goods that we dont have in our country, to keep contact and to make friends with the other countries foe situations in the future
It is how you rely on other countries to trade with you.
by what we trade with other countries
Ottoman taxes and restrictions on trade in its territory encouraged Europeans to seek new trade routes to Asia.