The Northwest Ordinance outlawed slavery in the territory. However the ordinance did allow for indentured servants to be held in the territory. The US Constitution did not prohibit slavery at that time.
How did the massachusetts state constitution 1780 differ from most of the other state constituions?
they just were different
Hamilton was loose, whereas Jefferson was strict in interpreting the Constitution.
The B of R deals with individual rights of citizens. The Constitution is the Law of the Land.
Historical accounts of slavery vary widely because different cultures treated slaves differently. Accounts of slavery within the same culture may also differ due to the sources' perception and beliefs regarding slavery coloring their accounts.
british constitution differ from the US Constitution is that they dont have rule
because it was a different type of slavery.
the north didnt want slavery but the south want slavery
It lacked fundamental laws.
it didnt
bwaa
Jacobs' descriptions of slavery's abuses was he was all for it. Douglass however was not into the slavery abuse.
They chucked it Down to the slavery comprimise.
one way that salvery is differ in the Americas than the west African would be the platiation , because we don't have a large plantation in America
How did the massachusetts state constitution 1780 differ from most of the other state constituions?
They didn't
Slavery was accepted in the colonies primarily for economic reasons, as it provided a cheap source of labor for plantations and agricultural work. Additionally, there were existing racial prejudices that dehumanized African slaves and justified their enslavement in the eyes of many colonists. The legal and social structures of the time also supported and perpetuated the institution of slavery.