government to set prices over some private businesses.
Railroads
munn vs Illinois
Supreme Court case of Munn v Illinois showed that states need to regulate certain businesses
The Supreme Court case that overturned Munn v. Illinois was Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Illinois (1886). In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that states could not regulate rates for interstate railroad traffic because it violated the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce. This decision limited the ability of states to regulate certain aspects of interstate commerce.
The Supreme Court of Illinois
uy6jhuj
The Granger laws were legal -Apex
Wabash v. Illinois
Wabash v. Illinois
* Illinois Supreme Court * Illinois Appellate Court * Illinois Circuit Courts
No, states are not obligated to follow other states legal decisions; however, the decisions may carry persuasive weight with the court, assuming (for example) the Iowa Supreme Court ruling doesn't violate the Illinois state constitution or statutes.If Iowa is is the only other state court system that has addressed this PARTICULAR issue then the decision of Iowa's Supreme Court can be used as "precedent" for the Illinois court to follow. If there are other states that have addressed this PARTICULAR issue and they have either agreed with, or disagreed with, the Iowa court's findings, those decisions should be also be taken into account when the Illinois court considers the issue.
The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in the following cases:revenue, mandamus, and habeas corpus. Otherwise it is simply the final court of appeal on all other state matters that have come up from the Circuit Court on appeal.
The Supreme Court of Illinois is part of the Judicial Branch of the Illinois State government.