0
In which Supreme Court decision did the court rule that a state could not regulate railroad rates because the railroad carried freight across state lines?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wabash v. Illinois
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which Supreme Court decision did the court rule that a state could not regulate railroad rates because the railroad carried freight across state lines?
Wabash v. Illinois
What was the supreme court case that overturned the munn V. Illinois?
The Supreme Court case that overturned Munn v. Illinois was Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Illinois (1886). In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that states could not regulate rates for interstate railroad traffic because it violated the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce. This decision limited the ability of states to regulate certain aspects of interstate commerce.
The supreme court ruling in Dred Scott v Stanford 1857 helped to increase sectional conflict because the decision?
The Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) held that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered United States citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. This decision intensified sectional conflict by reinforcing the divide between slave states and free states, fueling tensions over the expansion of slavery into new territories. The ruling was seen as a victory for pro-slavery advocates and a setback for those seeking to abolish slavery, further polarizing the nation on the issue.
How did a supreme court decision inflame passions?
Because they disagree with it.
The Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v Sandford 1857 helped to increase sectional conflict because the decision-?
The Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford 1857 worsened sectional conflict by declaring that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not citizens and could not sue in the federal courts. This decision further entrenched divisions between the North and South over the issue of slavery and fed into the growing tensions that eventually led to the Civil War.
What was the reasoning behind the Supreme Court's decision in Marbury v Madison?
Does the supreme court have the power to invalidate an act of congress because it violates the constitution.
The Supreme Court decision in the case Marbury v. Madison is important because?
It allowed the Supreme Court to overrule an unconstitutional law.
Why were abolitionist angered by the Dred Scott decision?
Because the decision showed that the Supreme Court didn't think that any State could outlaw slavery.
How can a state be forced to follow a Supreme Court decision with which it disagrees?
Just because the state doesn't agree, if the US Supreme Court renders a decision in your favor the state must comply! There is no higher court than the US Supreme Court - the state cannot file an appeal.
What historic supreme court decision sparked the conflict?
Unfortunately, I cannot answer your question because you did not specify which conflict.
Was the abolition of slavery a US Supreme Court decision?
No. Slavery was abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution in a joint effort between Congress and the states that ratified the amendment. A constitutional amendment is more powerful than a US Supreme Court decision, because it is not subject to change by the Supreme Court.
The United States Supreme Court decision in the Dred Scott v Sandford 1857 was important because it-?
The United States Supreme Court decision in the DDred Scott v. Sandford (1857 was important because it helped strengthen the determination of abolitionists to realize their goals.
