answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

munn vs Illinois

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: In which Supreme Court decision did the court uphold the right for states to regulate railroads and grain elevators?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What does the case of Munn v Illinois gave states the right to regulate?

Munn v. Illinois, 94 US 113 (1877)The US Supreme Court defined certain private businesses as "private utilities" operating in the public interest, and gave the States the right to regulate the prices they charged their customers. Munn specifically addressed the use of grain elevators, but the Court's decision applied the regulatory rights across a broad spectrum of industries, including railroads, that operated intrastate.


Why didnt the decision in the munn v Lliois case succeed in checking the power of the railroad?

The Supreme Court up held the Granger Laws by a vote of seven to two. . -Goosinater


What did the supreme court case of Munn v. Illinois give states the right to regulate?

government to set prices over some private businesses.


Is a Supreme Court decision permanent?

In most cases a Supreme Court decision is permanent. The current Supreme Court can change the decision of a previous Supreme Court.


In which Supreme Court decision did the court rule that a state could not regulate railroad rates because the railroad carried freight across state lines?

Wabash v. Illinois


Which Supreme Court decision did the court rule that a state could not regulate railroad rates because the railroad carried freight across state lines?

Wabash v. Illinois


The supreme court ruling in Dred Scott v Stanford 1857 helped to increase sectional conflict because the decision?

The Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) held that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered United States citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. This decision intensified sectional conflict by reinforcing the divide between slave states and free states, fueling tensions over the expansion of slavery into new territories. The ruling was seen as a victory for pro-slavery advocates and a setback for those seeking to abolish slavery, further polarizing the nation on the issue.


What did the interstate commerce commission regulate?

The Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) regulated commercial transportation between the states: railroads, trucking, shipping, air freight; basically it regulated anything that moved goods. It originally started with the growth and development of railroads during the 19th century. The railroads in general were owned by fabulously wealthy investors, since it took a vast amount of capital to lay tracks and purchase the expensive engines and cars, the "high technology" of their day. In return for vast investments, the railroads expected vast profits, and they engaged in all sorts of unsavory tactics that were unfair to their customers. The ICC was established in 1887 following a Supreme Court decision in favor of railroads that ONLY the U.S. government could regulate interstate commerce, another blow against State's Rights. The U.S. Constitution only says the following about interstate commerce, describing the power of Congress: "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes". Everything else that has come after is the result of legislation and court decisions.


How did each of john marshall's 3 landmark decisions change the power of the supreme court?

Gibbons v. Ogden was the landmark decision which Supreme Court held that the power to regulate interstate commerce was actually granted to the Congress by Commerce Clause in Article I of the Constitution.


Who is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court during the case of Gibbons vs Ogden?

John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court during the Gibbons vs Ogden Case. This landmark decision invoked that the power to regulate interstate trade was granted via the constitution.


How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?

The supreme's court overturned Miranda conviction in a 5 to 4 decision.


To which amendment does this Supreme Court decision refer?

Since you didn't say WHICH Supreme Court decision, there is no way to answer the question.