Hitler believed that Jews were the scum of the earth and not even considered people. By getting rid of them he thought the world would be a better place.
I think they will feel ok about it unless they are jewish
i hate it
I don't think the Holocaust had any religious significance. It would be very odd to suggest, for example, that the victims atoned for the sins of the world, or anything like that.
there would not have been the Holocaust without the Jews.
It was bad
if you are asking for a monetary value, then not a lot. But i cannot think of any human who would want to make a financial profit out of it, they (as countless people have) would donate the pictures to one of the many Holocaust museums.
It would be best if you had a prefered angle to come from: The Nazis: Were ordinary soldiers forced to perpetrate the Holocaust? The Victims: Did the Jews of occupied countries think that their governments would save them? The Allies: Why were there not more relief efforts to save the survivors after liberation? Reflection: Did the rise in Holocaust denial in the 70's and 80's lead to an increace in Holocaust research? obviously it depends on what level you are at.
I don't think there is anything called the 'Iran Holocaust'.
it depends what you think that enough is, if they had saved half of the victims would that have been enough.
It depends how you define holcaust. However, if you must know, there is a current holocaust going on in Darfur, Sudan. www.savedarfur.com or just google darfur.
Nothing I can think of.
what did people think of the holocaust that was reported during world war two?