You can not be denied those rights.
Thomas Jefferson wrote about unalienable rights in the Declaration of Independence. The idea was adapted from the philosophy of John Locke.
unalienable rights
The phrase "certain unalienable rights" is not in the U.S. Constitution at all, and so they are not guaranteed. The phrase appears in the Declaration of Independence, at the beginning of the second paragraph: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Since the Declaration of Independence did only what its title says, declare independence from Britain, and listed the reasons for it, it has no force at law.
The definition of "unalienable rights," is those rights that cannot be surrendered, sold or transferred to someone else - the government, for example, or another person. Some people refer to these as "natural" or "God-given" rights (life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness). Certain unalienable rights, such as a Social Security number, however, are "unalienable" only because the law prohibits reassigning your number to someone else. In contrast, "inalienable rights" are those rights that can only be transferred with the consent of the person possessing those rights. The Declaration of Independence talks about "unalienable rights." I depends on how you define "rights". Webster has it as "something to which one has a just claim" or "the power or privilege to which one is justly entitled" or "something one may claim as properly due". This doesn't mean that you always possess this "something" or "privilege", it just means that there are certain things that you have a just claim to, or to which you are justly entitled or that you may claim as properly due. These aren't unalienable realities, but rather rights. Others, including governments may violate your God-given rights, by violating the Creator's rules, but that doesn't take away the appropriateness of your claim to it. Violating your rights, doesn't remove your rights. It prevents you from exercising your rights. You still have certain rights, the founders would claim, given to you by your Creator. [Some people confuse] "rights" with "realities". Perhaps due to an absence in that ethic of an absolute "rightness". If that ethical view is accepted, then the word "right" as an abstract thing to which you are entitled, is truly nonsense. Then truly,in such an ethic, no one ever has any cause to complain when they are inconvenienced, slapped or killed. For that matter, why would anything matter at all on any level.
The freedom of expression and speech are natural and unalienable human rights. They form the central pillars to democracy and its rule of law. The removal of any of these rights would cause the death of democracy.
It means rights that cannot be taken away.
refers to the concept of rights that are completely inseparable from those to whom they belong.
Some of these rights are unalienable because no matter who you are these rights apply to you. No matter the circumstances.
Inalienable; as, unalienable rights.
The way to say unalienable rights is UN-ALIEN-ABLE
It means to be like a law that can`t be taken away because unalienable means can`t be taken away!!
What The declaration of independence says all men are created equal endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights.'' what does this mean?
life liberty and the pursuit of happiness
Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
He based his "unalienable rights" on the work of English Philosopher John Locke.
Everybody has unalienable rights; they can't be taken away.
Whats A Nonexample of Unalienable Rights