Native Americans believed that they were apart of nature. They also believed that the land was sacred and have been given to them to live on and to use. Europeans believed you must kill, take over, or destroy the people that claimed it in order for the Europeans to claim the land.
This is a complicated question that requires ownership to be defined as each saw it. Please also understand that when talking about Native Tribes, there are a large number of these tribes and I speak only in general terms about them; as some had slightly different concepts. Ownership by Exclusion is the key to understanding the differences between European values and Native values. Both felt you could 'own' the land, possession being ownership; but the Natives as a general rule did not believe you could exclude another from it while that was the very definition of the term by European standards.
Once Native tribes learned that this was the definition by the new people, they then began to make these claims to exclude them, while remaining (at least generally) socialist about property ownership among the tribe. Native American tribes were a very long practiced form of socialist government, and too few remain so today.
Areas of cooperation between the Europeans and native Americans
No, it was a long battle of cultural and political differences that led to a long, unofficial war between European immigrants and Native Americans. Much of what fueled this war were the conflicting views on property ownership, religious beliefs and general lifestyle. The Native Americans were often seen as animals that were unable to conform to what the Europeans saw as their more advanced and civilized way of life. The Native Americans often saw it the other way around, that the Europeans were trashing the land and showing no respect to what we know now as the U.S.A.
they no like each other
the Europeans are from Europe and the Taino's are from puerto rico
rlly
Areas of cooperation between the Europeans and native Americans
Mesoamericans are Native Americans
No, it was a long battle of cultural and political differences that led to a long, unofficial war between European immigrants and Native Americans. Much of what fueled this war were the conflicting views on property ownership, religious beliefs and general lifestyle. The Native Americans were often seen as animals that were unable to conform to what the Europeans saw as their more advanced and civilized way of life. The Native Americans often saw it the other way around, that the Europeans were trashing the land and showing no respect to what we know now as the U.S.A.
Tobacco
Americans tend to eat more burgers
a kool way of explaining this is that a public limited
It was in their views of nature and land . To the Europeans when tihey got off their boats and saw empty land they saw land not "owned" or fenced by another. They came from a world where the land was owned and fenced. To see vast open spaces meant that they could claim what they wanted. To the native Americans living in this land no one could own the land. There was no idea or word for ownership. The land was to be taken care of by all and so were the animals. These two cultural ideas were in complete conflict with each other.
they no like each other
A stock represents partial ownership in a company. A bond represents a loan to a company.
Ownership in companies is traded in the Stock Market while ownership of foreign money is traded in the currency exchange market.
Native Americans (North and South) and Europeans.
His did the economy of the southern colonies depend on enslaved africans