Want this question answered?
In my opinion no,they were kinda stealing the land from the native Americans "not Indians",but on the other hand that is a bad question because it is a moral question,so the answer really depends on your view/standpoint/opinion.
According to Red Wolf, a native American, "MORE THAN 20 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE UNITED STATES ARE OF NATIVE AMERICAN INDIAN MIXED BLOOD. IF YOU HAVE ONE DROP OF INDIAN BLOOD, YOU ARE INDIAN. WALK THE INDIAN PATH AS YOUR HEART FEELS". Don't forget all the Indians in Asian India. Whether you are a member of a particular ethnic group if you have one parent from that group, one grandparent, one great-grandparent, or "one drop of blood" (an obsolete and racist way of saying "any ancestry no matter how small") is a matter of how you and the culture you live in looks at things. There is no universal agreement on this point. In the days of American segregation, having a great-great-grandparent who was black would make you black - as long as your skin was also dark. The Nazis held that anyone was Jewish if they had one grandparent who was Jewish. Advocates for Native Americans, who want to preserve Native identity in the face of widespread intermarriage with descendants of Europeans over the centuries, will say that anyone with any native ancestry is a native American - thus leaving it to the individual to discover and assert that connection. On the other hand, US government criteria for recognizing a Native American for purposes of receiving government benefits is more restrictive.
well; it depends on what your talking about by "native American" if you mean like the native American people (indians): the European explorers forced them out of their lands and homes. if you mean "Native American" like the original colonies and stuff-the European Culture had GREAT effects on our early early American culture-about the time the 13 colonies were established.
He used gestures and the natives and the explorers started learning each other's languages. It probably didn't matter because the explorer's didn't care about the Indians, all they wanted was land and riches.
Most of the areas in the Southwest are not heavily forested, and most of the plant life consists of prairie grasses and scrub brush. So the native tribes used the material at hand, fashioning clay and straw into adobe bricks.
Hand gestures are important because you can communicate whether it being with the audience or a partner.
Most western gestures are recognized in Mexico, such as the OK, thumbs up, check please or crossed fingers gestures. On the other hand, most offensive gestures are also recognized and can get you in trouble, such as the finger, the fig or the talk to the hand gestures.
No, the hand gestures are not viewed as a defense mechanism but communication mechanism. Some of the hand gestures that is viewed as a defense mechanism includes crossed arms with fists and arm crossed with thumbs.
Avoid brisk and large gestures, and speak calmly!there are the gestures in iceland. Avoid brisk and large gestures, and speak calmly!there are the gestures in iceland.
The flintlock, smooth bore musket was the most common weapon used by the French, English, and Indians during the French and Indian War. Toward the end of the war, all sides used bayonets. The Indians used hand-to-hand combat at times.
Some common hand gestures include waving, pointing, giving a thumbs up, and making a peace sign. Hand gestures can vary widely in meaning across different cultures and social contexts.
It means you have power, or you are bleeding.
Athlete hand gestures could mean different things based upon which position they are, and the situation. For example, a quarterback may make gestures as to what the play is going to be, and a receiver or running back could make celebration gestures after making a big play.
movements you make with your hand eg. pointing at something.
5
Jester should be spelt "gestures". It means hand movements...
United States Indians where what they call in-gu-ma,meaning gauntlet for hands,its an Indian usage.