The gladiatorial games were the most popular form on entertainment. The spectators valued a good, skilled and fair fight. However, this was about what the Roman valued in these contests, not about more general Roman values. To them it was like a sport.
It is a matter of opinion. For the Romans the gladiatorial games a d the chariot races were the two most popular forms of entertainment. The gladiatorial games were popular with other peoples in the Roman Empire. They did not start in Rome. The y originated from Campanians, who lived to the south of Rome
The basic reason was for entertainment. Some historians like to put symbolism in the hunting event by proposing that they were showing the people the superiority of the Romans over forces of nature. But to the people of the time it was exciting entertainment as the hunts were staged in elaborate forest settings, and in the Colosseum, live trees and shrubs were used.
Gladiatorial fights wee advertised the same as anything else in the ancient world, by writing on walls. The old advertisements would be whitewashed over and the new announcements painted over them. There are numerous pieces of advertising from Pompeii advertising rentals, election preferences and gladiatorial bouts. The gladiatorial ads would say how many pairs of fighters would be performing, the name of a famous gladiator if he were among the contestants and if there would be an animal hunt or an awning for shade.
Sparticus spartacus was the most famous i doubt the best tho, id say flamma, he lived till he was 30 and as it over 2000 years ago and he was a gladiator id say that was a good life span, he fought 34 times which is a lot of fights, concidering how often each one got to fight, he won 21 times drew 9 and lost 4 which is impressive, how he won crowd favour 3 times, and he was awarded the retis which is a small wodden sword and his freedom 4 times, and stayed as a gladiator ever time, id say he was a great gladiator
Latin is the roman language
Not until the death. A glaidator's weapons depended on their origen, as many fighters were abducted from their home towns in the empire to fight. The person who had put on the event had the final say who lived and died, but had to consider the fact that they had to pay back the lamparoes or manager for every gladiator killed belonging to them. In fact, in a 100 fights, only 15 galdiators were killed on average.
The basic reason was for entertainment. Some historians like to put symbolism in the hunting event by proposing that they were showing the people the superiority of the Romans over forces of nature. But to the people of the time it was exciting entertainment as the hunts were staged in elaborate forest settings, and in the Colosseum, live trees and shrubs were used.
As the Romans built the Colosseum, you would have to say it was the Roman society that built it.
The Viking society is older. (I think) Some historians say the Vikings were living in Scandinavia at 1000 BC. If true, this would make their society much older than the Roman.
Al haarib
Gladiatorial fights wee advertised the same as anything else in the ancient world, by writing on walls. The old advertisements would be whitewashed over and the new announcements painted over them. There are numerous pieces of advertising from Pompeii advertising rentals, election preferences and gladiatorial bouts. The gladiatorial ads would say how many pairs of fighters would be performing, the name of a famous gladiator if he were among the contestants and if there would be an animal hunt or an awning for shade.
A gladiator only had to fight in a certain number of bouts before being freed. The sources are mixed on the exact number. Some say ten bouts and others say five bouts with most leaning towards five bouts. However a gladiator could also reenlist, so to speak, and stay on longer.
Sparticus spartacus was the most famous i doubt the best tho, id say flamma, he lived till he was 30 and as it over 2000 years ago and he was a gladiator id say that was a good life span, he fought 34 times which is a lot of fights, concidering how often each one got to fight, he won 21 times drew 9 and lost 4 which is impressive, how he won crowd favour 3 times, and he was awarded the retis which is a small wodden sword and his freedom 4 times, and stayed as a gladiator ever time, id say he was a great gladiator
The family was seen as the fundamental unit of Roman society. The conservatives also stressed the importance of tradition and ancient customs and public morals. The Romans also had the concept of citizenship, which also involved Roman citizens having rights, including the right to vote.
a good man
heiuhdfvsdiuhvsdsd
desfrutar das lutas
It varied greatly. Some writings glorified the virtues of the Romans, the splendour of its buildings and the Roman conquests. Some were nostalgic of the good old days. Some were moralistic. Some were critical of Roman society (particularly the satires) or of some of the ruler.