0
What does a scientist need to do once an experiment is complete what must a scientist do to determine whether the data support the hypothesis?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
They come up with a conclusion to the hypothesis
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do you know the students in the above study are acting as scientist?
Students could be seen to be acting as scientist if they are following the scientific method - Make observations, postulate a hypothesis, and form and complete experiments or further observations to confirm or refute that hypothesis.
What is the sequence of steps of the scientific method?
The scientific method uses a sequence of steps in order to complete an experiment. In order, you ask a question, do background research, construct a hypothesis, test the hypothesis using an experiment, analyze your data, and communicate your results.
What should scientist do if they want to test a hypothesis?
Well, they should ask a question, observe, make a hypothesis, and predict before they even think about testing a hypothesis. I will give some steps to complete after you make your prediction: 1. Plan your experiment. Write it out on paper, and make sure you identify the variables. 2. List the supplies you need. Make sure you have all of them, then lay them out somewhere safe and easy to clean up. 3. Set up whatever you need to, like taping something, focusing a telescope, whatever you need. 4. Conduct the experiment. Make sure to review the written plan. 5. After the experiment, if your hypothesis was wrong, revise it and repeat the experimental stage. 6. Once your experiment tells you your hypothesis is right, repeat experiments to confirm that it is now a scientific theory. Source: From our school science book, Integrated iScience, by Glencoe. It is a very helpful book.
When the experiment is complete what does the researcher do?
Repeats the experiment for validity
What are idea models mainly used for?
To try to form complete hypothesis.
Why is collaboration of scientist is necessary for the process of scientific study?
The most important reason is if a single scientist forms a hypothesis and it is proved by his or her experiment it is still only a hypothesis. Other scientists need to repeat the experiment in every way conceivable to either prove or disprove the hypothesis. Only after the hypothesis has stood up to such scrutiny may it become a theory recognized by the scientific community. Another reason is that some research is simply too daunting and complex for a single person to complete.
In what order would a scientist complete these events Renumber the events in the Correct Order column?
A scientist will begin by devising the experiment, and the process will culminate with analyzing the results of that experiment.
What is meant by hypothesis testing?
In Statistics, for making inferences or judgement from the data collected, hypothesis is laid, which is nothing but a statement made based on the sample, about the population of interest. After the experiment is complete, the values are compared with the table values, and inferences are made either by disproving the hypothesis, by accepting the null hypothesis and vice- versa It means to perform an experiment on your hypothesis (theory) to see if it is correct or not.
How do you know the students in the above study are acting as scientist?
Students could be seen to be acting as scientist if they are following the scientific method - Make observations, postulate a hypothesis, and form and complete experiments or further observations to confirm or refute that hypothesis.
What is the sequence of steps of the scientific method?
The scientific method uses a sequence of steps in order to complete an experiment. In order, you ask a question, do background research, construct a hypothesis, test the hypothesis using an experiment, analyze your data, and communicate your results.
What is the sequence of the steps of the scientific method?
The scientific method uses a sequence of steps in order to complete an experiment. In order, you ask a question, do background research, construct a hypothesis, test the hypothesis using an experiment, analyze your data, and communicate your results.
Why don't you need to complete the steps of scientific method in a scientific order?
You absolutely do! If you did the experiment then your background research then your hypothesis then recorded your data then asked your question and last made a conclusion how would your experiment go?
Why don't you need to complete the steps of scientific methods in a scientific order?
You absolutely do! If you did the experiment then your background research then your hypothesis then recorded your data then asked your question and last made a conclusion how would your experiment go?
Why don't you need to complete the steps of scientific methods in specific order?
You absolutely do! If you did the experiment then your background research then your hypothesis then recorded your data then asked your question and last made a conclusion how would your experiment go?
Why don't you need to complete the steps of scientific methods in a specific order?
You absolutely do! If you did the experiment then your background research then your hypothesis then recorded your data then asked your question and last made a conclusion how would your experiment go?
What should scientist do if they want to test a hypothesis?
Well, they should ask a question, observe, make a hypothesis, and predict before they even think about testing a hypothesis. I will give some steps to complete after you make your prediction: 1. Plan your experiment. Write it out on paper, and make sure you identify the variables. 2. List the supplies you need. Make sure you have all of them, then lay them out somewhere safe and easy to clean up. 3. Set up whatever you need to, like taping something, focusing a telescope, whatever you need. 4. Conduct the experiment. Make sure to review the written plan. 5. After the experiment, if your hypothesis was wrong, revise it and repeat the experimental stage. 6. Once your experiment tells you your hypothesis is right, repeat experiments to confirm that it is now a scientific theory. Source: From our school science book, Integrated iScience, by Glencoe. It is a very helpful book.
Is scientist a complete subject or complete predicate?
Scientist would be a complete subject.
