Note, please, that this answer specifically applies to the United States. Legal procedures in other countries are different, sometimes very different; the rights you have there, if any, may be very different as well, and police departments there may not routinely read out your rights at all. Don't assume.
The Supreme Court, in the case Miranda v. Arizona, did not prescribe a particular wording, so it varies from location to location. The ruling in that case states that:
The person in custody must, prior to interrogation, be clearly informed that he/she has the right to remain silent, and that anything the person says will be used against that person in court; the person must be clearly informed that he/she has the right to consult with an attorney and to have that attorney present during questioning, and that, if he/she is indigent, an attorney will be provided at no cost to represent him/her. Because most movies and TV shows are made in either New York or California, most people are most familar with the warning as it is commonly given in one or the other of those states, but a slight variation in the wording does not render a Miranda warning invalid as long as it adequately conveys the rights listed above.
Some states have a slightly different method of providing attorneys, and in those states the warning may contain a phrase like "We have no way of giving you a lawyer, but one will be appointed for you if you wish when you go to court." The US Supreme Court has approved this variant as an accurate statement of the procedure in those states.
In some states (notably those along the border with Mexico) an additional clause along the lines of "If you are not a US citizen, you may contact your country's consulate prior to any questioning" is added.
There is no "Exact" way of saying the Miranda Warning. The warning differs state-to-state and department-to-department.
Generally, you'll hear something similar to this:
Nothing more or less than you are informed of your rights. There is no reason NOT to tell anyone their rights.
The term is usually used to mean a person who is not a police officer that regularly gives information about crimes to the police.
it means you are not allowing the police officer to continue with his job. Or just interfering or hindering with the officer
try www.dictionary.com
LE Officer = Law Enforcement Officer = Police = Cop
A Police Officer learns to deal with a lot of people of different cultures in a diverse society.
i am pretty sure it is when you tell a police officer the %$^% off or something
To be considered an ex-police officer means that at one time the person worked as a police officer. The person would be considered an ex-police after they were either laid off, quit, or retired.
I am interpreting your question to mean, "Can the police notify your probation officer that you are making a complaint against a police officer?" The answer is "yes." The police can make contact with your probation officer at any time, for any reason, and convey any information they care to disclose.
When an officer tells the offender his or her rights when arrested" You Have the right to remain silent anything you do or say will be held against you In a court of law" that's merandise and if the police dont tell you your rights then In your trail in court you will have to be let free because they didn't tell you your rights
Polizeibeamter in German means police officer in English.
poopy face ypur dumb
It depends on the circumstances, but basically, if he is acting in self defense, yes. If you mean can a police officer just randomly hit people for no reason, no, that isn't legal.