Legal admissibility refers to the permissibility a certain object that is presented in court of law is allowed to be considered as "evidence".
The presiding judge.
That's what it is called: The Rules of Evidence.
standing
Wm. Clifton. Travis has written: 'Admissibility of evidence' -- subject(s): Evidence (Law)
your mom eats waffles.
Miscellaneous evidence refers to any material or information that does not fit neatly into specific categories of evidence in a legal context. It may include various items, documents, or testimony that are not directly related to the main issues of a case but may still be relevant or informative. Such evidence is typically considered on a case-by-case basis by the court to determine its admissibility and relevance.
It means that the court has studied the evidence and found convincing evidence and has ruled that you ARE the legal father.
Some of the federal rules of evidence for judicial proceedings include admissibility, reasonable doubt, and authentication . These rules are known as Title 28 of the United States Code.
THIS IS AN INAPPROPRIATE PREMISE FOR THIS VENUE. This is a springboard for discussion and debate and not a request for a specific and definitive answer.
legal requirement for acquiring admissible statements because all the states require that evidence provided by the defendant be voluntary obtained from such a defendant without violation of any rights of a defendant. The only difference which has been observed in all the states is that in California, admissibility of statement depends on the decision of the judges unlike in other states where admissibility of statements is based on the circumstances under which the statement was obtained and application of the law concerning obtaining of evidence from a defendant or a witness. From a personal perspective, the most interesting concept regarding admissibility of statements in these states is that the rights of the defendant are highly observed while obtaining any form of information from the defendant. His shows that, despite the defendant being the one who is usually accused for committing a certain offence, he or she does not cease to be a human being and should therefore be accorded all the rights that a human being is entitled to.
A Deposition is a recorded statement made under oath that can be entered into evidence in a legal proceeding.
They are both rulings having to do with the admissiability of expert testimony in court cases. For a search of both - enter them into the search box of WikiPedia.