Rita M. Holl, RN, PhD, states that "Within Western medicine, iridology is considered a controversial science at best and medical fraud at worst." Research is controversial.
Research on iridology has shown that there is no scientific evidence to support its claims of diagnosing medical conditions based on the patterns of the iris. The practice is considered pseudoscience by the medical community, and any perceived benefits are likely due to a placebo effect rather than actual diagnostic accuracy. It is important to rely on evidence-based methods for medical diagnosis and treatment.
one that merits extensive research
There are various merits attached to globalization. For example, there is the fact that it has made research and development a global endeavor.
No special preparations are necessary before an iridology reading.
Iridology readings are performed by naturopaths, chiropractors, nutritionists, iridologists.
Iridology is also called iris analysis or iris diagnosis.
A book published by Philippus Meyers in 1670, called Chiromatica medica, noted that signs in the iris indicate diseases.
An iridology reading is unlikely to cause physical harm by itself. Critics of iridology say that readings that suggest a condition that does not exist or missing a condition that does exist could be unhealthy.
Iridology began with a book called Chiromatica medica by Philippus Meyers, 1670. The father of iridology is Dr. Ignatz von Peczely, 1881. And Swedish homeopath Nils Liljequist, 1800's.
Joe Shelby Riley has written: 'Iridology Simplified' -- subject(s): Iridology
The Genesis of Healing - 2007 Iridology - 1.8 was released on: USA: 2007
IRIDOLOGY
Farida Sharan has written: 'Iridology' 'Herbs of grace' -- subject(s): Naturopathy, Herbs, Therapeutic use, Iridology