Want this question answered?
Thomas Karis has written: 'The treason trial in South Africa' -- subject(s): Apartheid, Race relations, Trials (Treason) 'South Africa' -- subject(s): Politics and government, Indigenous peoples
they were denied a trial by jury
Violated their right to a jury trial.
Violated their right to a jury trial.
The prosecution of the British soldiers who shot into the crowd of colonists was headed by Samuel Quincy The defense of the British soldiers was headed by John Adams. In a criminal court in the United States the prosecution represents "the people". However, this trial occurred in 1770. Massachusetts was a colony of England during this trial. The prosecution of an English court represents "The Crown". So technically no one represented the colonists at the Boston Massacre trial.
The underlying cause of the war was the colonists' unrelenting desire for more and more land, but the immediate cause for its outbreak was the trial and execution of three of Metacom’s men by the colonists.
Michel Afanasiev has written: 'Trial of indigenous and exotic trees in Harar province'
many colonest felt like they had the right to govern them selves.
many colonest felt like they had the right to govern them selves.
many colonest felt like they had the right to govern them selves.
declaratory act of 1766
Chapter 3 of "The Fifth of March" focuses on the aftermath of the Boston Massacre, detailing the trial of the British soldiers involved. The chapter discusses the tensions between the colonists and British authorities, as well as the legal strategies used by both sides during the trial. It highlights the growing resentment and resistance among the colonists towards British rule.