Want this question answered?
As strange as it may seem, Texas has had earthquakes. Within the last year, I have heard of two in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
they have caused a widespread damage in Texas
That would most likely be Texas. But it would seem that Alabama meets most of these criteria as well.
High Plains
high plains
Earthquakes with lower magnitude can cause more damage than higher ranking earthquakes because sometimes the buildings are easier to break in some areas than others for example : an earthquake with a 6 on the richtor scale in Texas may do more damage than a 7 on the richtor scale in California.
As strange as it may seem, Texas has had earthquakes. Within the last year, I have heard of two in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
in Texas there has been a very big one
over 9000!
washington
Because Texas was considered a secondary front, with no primary strategic objective and therefore it was less concerned by military operations, especially after the Union gained the control of the Mississippi River.
Oh yah. Texas is right on the Galveston fault.
I think San Fansico and Texas and more
new zealand have earthquakes
they have caused a widespread damage in Texas
The losses that Mexicans suffer under Santa Anna was the loss of major land know as Texas
because it was not involved