It will cause dehydration.
it will polute the plants and animals near the water...
It would detroy the environment around it and pollute and kill animals and water:)
It would have effect on ecosystems because it could have dieses that other animals have never encountered before. It would have effect on it because it its new.
Land would have more species of animals than water but as far as the quantities then water would have a larger number of animals than land.
There would be less animals
If there were no plants and animals in the water, there would be an abundance of bacteria. Many plants and animals help to keep down bacteria growth in waters.
Animals will only live in areas where there is enough water for them to survive. Thus, fish and amphibians can only live in bodies of water, and animals like mammals, reptiles, birds, and many insects can live farther away. In a place with very little water, it may be that only animals which can acquire all of their necessary water from food can exist. In a place with abundant water, generally there is a greater variety and population of animals.
Animals that need water
The least effect on the water cycle would likely be reducing industrial waste and pollution, as this would have a minimal impact on the overall water cycle compared to other activities such as deforestation or excessive water extraction. However, all human activities can still contribute to changes in the water cycle, so it is important to consider all factors.
How come animals drink pond water and they don't get sick
you would be working with any mammals or animals living under water.
I diubt that the salt in the water would have any effect however the chlorine in the water might if the balance of the water is not correct.