it will polute the plants and animals near the water...
It would detroy the environment around it and pollute and kill animals and water:)
It would have effect on ecosystems because it could have dieses that other animals have never encountered before. It would have effect on it because it its new.
Land would have more species of animals than water but as far as the quantities then water would have a larger number of animals than land.
There would be less animals
If there were no plants and animals in the water, there would be an abundance of bacteria. Many plants and animals help to keep down bacteria growth in waters.
it doesn't all animals need water to survive over wise they would be extinct in much respect every life source of which need some sort of energy or water to survive. what you mean is that pollution which can effect water and contaminate it could effect a animals life if so the animals drinks the water then it will make the animal ill as there are many microscopic parasites and germs which can contaminate water, for some water is unlikely to be effected as they are filtered and cleaned however in poorer countries they have to drink dirty water and also this means animals will to.
The least effect on the water cycle would likely be reducing industrial waste and pollution, as this would have a minimal impact on the overall water cycle compared to other activities such as deforestation or excessive water extraction. However, all human activities can still contribute to changes in the water cycle, so it is important to consider all factors.
Animals that need water
How come animals drink pond water and they don't get sick
you would be working with any mammals or animals living under water.
I diubt that the salt in the water would have any effect however the chlorine in the water might if the balance of the water is not correct.