When an earthquake hits a nuclear power plant the plant explodes and releases radiation. People must evacuate within 100-200 miles or less. They must have helicopters fly in the air and put down, Swiss cheese shaped platforms and drop medal rods through the holes. Then the rods absorb the radiation and reduce it. Or they keep on pouring water into the plant, Otherwise there will be a meltdown
Drinking a chocolate banana milkshake does not cause an earthquake.
No, the San Francisco earthquake of 1906 did not cause a tsunami.
the earthquake
no
no, but it can cause sinkholes. Hope this helped!
It can cause pollution to the planet .
blast effects
An earthquake can definitely cause the world damage. In areas unprepared for earthquakes, it can cause massive damage to buildings and also kill people.
There are three common damages that an earthquake caused. It can either be physical damage, structural, and emotional. The strongest effects of an earthquake are in the area near the epicenter.
Nuclear bombs can be dangerous as during a atomic bomb explosions, it produces radiation. The effects of radiation could be that it can cause permanent damage to cells and can cause mutation. Along with this, it could cause severe burns to the skin.
what was the cause of Yunnan china earthquake
no...the earthquake did not cause a hole in the earth
Drinking a chocolate banana milkshake does not cause an earthquake.
There have been a few earthquakes felt in Minnesota, but many people have lived in the state their whole lives and never experienced an earthquake. The first earthquake was recorded in 1860. The largest earthquake was a Magnitude of 4.6 on July 8, 1975. The most recent earthquake in Minnesota was recorded on February 9, 1994.
No, the San Francisco earthquake of 1906 did not cause a tsunami.
To the best of astronomers knowledge, planets such as earth do not just explode. It would be a chemical or nuclear process that would cause the planet to explode.
What do you mean by earthquake? A nuclear device can cause a earthquake like seismic shock wave that feels like an earthquake. For example when North Korea detonated it's first two nuclear fission bombs in 2006 and 2009, we could determine the strength of the devices by the seismic wave that was created. In your question can a nuclear explosion actually cause an earth quake (sliding of tectonic plates), the answer is no. Nuclear detonations even under ground do not have enough energy to shift the plates. Objectively, the known fact at present may be that it doesn't, but, if the energy released can be read as a seismic wave, then there are a matter of unknown variables within the premise that it won't trigger a reaction to the tectonic plates. Those tests are very limited and in controlled conditions. So you simply cannot say a definitive no to the potential variables involved within the physical science of a chain reaction in a sensitive area - like along or in the Ring of Fire. You cannot predict the weather with 100% certainty all the time even with todays modeling technology just as they could not predict the catastrophic effects of Katrina on the surge protection or the devastation reactive effect of the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake/tsunami. You detonate a force of a nuclear weapon in an area that has high sensitivity to seismic activity you better pray that the 50/50 chance of that last line of defense and the above comment is positively infallible.