Nuremberg Trials
yes
At the Nuremberg trials, some former Nazis offered different defenses for their actions during the war. Some claimed they were just following orders and thus should not be held personally responsible for their actions. Others argued that they were unaware of the extent of the atrocities committed by the Nazi regime. However, these defenses were generally not accepted, and the principle of individual responsibility for war crimes was established.
Answer this question… They established a new category of crimes for actions similar to those of the Holocaust.
They were the inner core of the German political system and at their center were a small group of dedicated individuals who had bought into the "Mein Kamp" system espoused by Adolf Hitler. The core of the party was built around the SA, the SS and the charisma of a few individuals,
Both actions were massacres of Native Americans.
judicial Review
yes i think he should be accountable for his actions
yes
verstehen
Because even though you did what you did out of fear, you still did, and are therefore accountable for it.
The Nuremburg Trials are believed to have established the principle that a soldier or officer cannot commit crimes against humanity and then claim that he was "just following orders". He is supposed to refuse such orders. In reality, this only applies to nations who lose a war, and thus can be held accountable by the victors. Eg. - There have as yet been no arrests, or trials, for the variety of American and allied officers and serviceman who have participated in violations of the Geneva Convention. Yet it is not seriously doubted that some have taken place.
You demonstrate maturity when you are accountable for your own actions.
Yes, they can be held accountable. Any actions must be to the benefit of the principle.
Executives and directors should be held accountable for their corporations' actions if they were directly involved or complicit in illegal activities. However, they should not automatically be sent to jail for the actions of employees unless they were personally responsible for those actions. It is important to hold individuals accountable based on their level of involvement and responsibility.
Yes, without due care is a legal principle that holds individuals accountable for negligence or lack of caution in their actions or decisions. The concept emphasizes the responsibility to exercise reasonable care and attention to prevent harm or accidents. Failure to adhere to this standard can result in legal consequences or liabilities.
No
Human justice refers to the ethical principle that all individuals should be treated fairly and have equal access to rights and protections under the law. It encompasses the idea of holding individuals accountable for their actions and ensuring that they are punished or rewarded appropriately based on their behavior. Ultimately, human justice strives to create a just and equitable society where everyone is valued and respected.