Want this question answered?
In Australia, police officers are expected to abide by the law and are subject to oversight and accountability mechanisms, including internal disciplinary procedures and external bodies like police integrity commissions. The law prohibits excessive use of force by police officers, and instances of police brutality can be prosecuted under assault or misconduct laws. Additionally, individuals who believe they have been subjected to police brutality can make complaints to relevant oversight bodies.
In the current climate, "police brutality" is nothing more than a subjective term. You would have to determine how many people police have killed, which in 2017 was near 1,000. You would then have to determine which shootings were justified, and which shootings were not, which would most likely be your opinion. No objective, reasonable statistics exist.
Police brutality has been reported to have increased since the 9/11 attacks, but there are no published statistics on the frequency of police brutality actions.
Collective Opposed to Police Brutality was created in 1995.
There can be no justification for brutality. The job of the police is to protect and defend.
No-one should "do" police brutality, that's why it's called brutality rather than reasonable force, which is what police officers should use.
Shailendra Misra has written: 'Police Brutality' -- subject(s): Police brutality
Yes.
decades
Your question cannot be answered. Police brutality in the US is both a crime and a civil rights violation. There is no 'use' for it.
bananas
excessive use of force