none! they were just racist and did not want to believe the medical proof that there was no rape!
they were convicted because they were immigrants weslaco high rox!They were convicted because they were immigrants A+LS (:
Because there is irrefutable contemporaneous evidence to prove it.
It is generally impossible to prove a negative, so it's up to the people who think Hitler was Jewish to provide evidence. However, see the related question.
There was never any evidence to prove he was Jewish or not,Nobody would dare ask.
There is little evidence the prove that German's were mad and had to buy indulgences. This is just told by mouth.
not to feel guilty and to find evidence to prove you are guilty
Forensic evidence alone cannot always prove someone guilty. However, it can provide valuable information to support a case, but other factors such as alibis, witness testimony, and motive are also important in determining guilt. It is the combination of different types of evidence that is typically used to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The standard rule is that the burden of proof lies upon the prosecution to prove that the defendant is guilty, not for the defendant to prove he is innocent. That being said, as more evidence is presented by the prosecution, it is up to the defense to come up with evidence to refute the prosecution's evidence. In short answer, however, to store a defendant to prove his innocence, it is a joint effort between the defendant himself - someone who is fighting for his freedom - and the defense attorney.
No. Evidence is only presented if the prosecutor and defender need to argue the case. The evidence is only used to prove guilt or innocence.
(in the US) That is the beauty of the US Legal System. You do NOT have to prove that you are not guilty, the prosecution must prove that you ARE guilty.
Presentation of evidence and testimony to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
If the prosecutors have exculpatory evidence they must turn it over to the defense. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that shows that the defendant is not guilty or would help in his defense, A motion for exculpatory evidence is a defense motion asking the judge to order the prosecutors to turn such evidence over to the defense.
Enough evidence is needed to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the person committed the homicide.
no
The defense do not have to prove anything, if the prosecution fail to prove guilt, then the defendant is not guilty (in an ideal world). It may be the case thaat a jury may find guilt when a charge has not really been adequately proved to be true, but in this case the judge must direct them to find "not guilty" through lack of evidence.
You can be taken in as asuspect. But that does not mean they have enough evidence on you to prove you guilty. However if you smell like weed and they find drugs on your person or vehicle, then your probably going to be proven guilty.
Until they have all the evidence to prove you have committed the crime you can not be charged for it