0
Until they have all the evidence to prove you have committed the crime you can not be charged for it
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoit is when the judge at court says that the suspect in trial is innocent... until someone finds evidence that he/she is guilty.
ps: read Maximum Ride by: James Paterson :-)
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
According to roman law a person was considered innocent until proven..what?
Actually, it is much like Mexico is today, and they were guilty until proved innocent.
What will happen if Hillary Clinton is guilty?
No, everyone is PRESUMED innocent until proved to be guilty of something in a court of law. Mrs. Clinton has not been charged with any crimes, let alone taken to court. As a politician she has been smeared and attacked by political opponents and the press - no matter how much she protests her character has been smeared BUT this does not mean she has ACTUALLY done anything wrong.
Were the Scottsboro boys innocent?
YES!! Their attorney Samuel L. proved them innocent!
How would you use innocent in a sentence?
The man was set free because he proved that he was innocent of the crime. he was declared innocent of any crimes by the court.
Can you get out of the death penalty?
Yes, if you have a clemency or are proved innocent before the execution.
how did the french declaration of the rights of man and citizen relate to Locke's Enlightenment ideas?
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen guaranteed religious freedom, the freedom of speech and the press, and personal security, It said that people have natural and inalienable rights (liberty, property, personal security, and resistance to oppression), and every man is presumed innocent until he is proved guilty.
How did Ida B Wells try to fight lynching in the South by?
Proving the victims were innocent(APEX)ChickenChickenChickenChickenChicken
What is the person who is not guilty called?
If a person has not commit anykind of crime though he/she was convicted of that but atlast it was proved that he/she was not a criminal
When would self-disclosure be use negatively against someone?
Self-disclosure might be used negatively against someone when the legal system is involved. Our rights as they are read to us when arrested state "Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law". This is quite the opposite of "Innocent until proved Guilty", is it not?
What best describes the meaning of theorem?
A conclusion proved by deductive reasoning
Was Charles 1 guilty or innocent?
He was put on trial and they proved him guilty only because there were no defence lawyers. But I think he was innocent. Here are some points: 1. He married Henrietta Maria ONLY to get and alliance with France. 2. He wasn't trained to be king because his brother died before he was going to be king. 3. He ONLY made religious changes to the church to make the Protestants more popular, but all that did was make the Puritans suspicious. 4. He ONLY dissolved Parliament to make sure that they weren't going to take away Charles' power. Hope this helped ;)
What is the meaning of theorem?
A conclusion proved by deductive reasoning.
