The factors used to determine that a parent is unfit are generally governed by state laws with child endangerment being the determining factor. You would need to provide evidence such as witnesses, doctor reports, school reports, photos, etc., of behavior in the following list that includes some of the reasons a parent may be declared unfit:
Only a court can "revoke" a parent's rights.
In the US, the only 'person' who can 'revoke' someone's rights is the court. And in order to file an action/petition in the court you must be a legal adult, so a minor themselves can't do anything.
Take away and revoke are not synonymous in this scenario. I am not aware of a state that a parent can revoke a government issued document but I could be wrong. The state can revoke your license of course under certain penalties but I have never heard of a parent being able to revoke a license. Granted, a parent holds greater rights over a child than the government so theoretically your parents could take away your license among other things but not revoke. I hope that makes sense.
It is typically not going to be a problem legally unless pictures are involved. However, parents may revoke cell phone rights!
Generally speaking, all US citizens regardless of age are given the same rights granted by the US constitution and bill of rights. The only difference between being a minor (persons under 18) versus an adult (persons 18 and older) is that your parents have the right to evoke or revoke your rights.
You may not be able to do that. The holder of the life estate has to sign off on the property rights.
Legal guardianship can only be revoked by the court that awarded the decree or in some states a higher court or it can be relinquished by the guardian(s) through prescribed legal procedure. The rights that biological parents have regarding their children (such as visitation, support, etc.) will be stipulated in the final guardianship order from the court. Courts prefer that parents remain active in the child's life, but if there are no specific terms in the guardianship order for visitation rights and other issues, it is assumed that the guardians can "set the rules".
No, just evidence of substantial possession. see link below
Some people belive they know what is best for everyone. Of course, the rules they make don't apply to them.
No. Even if they are not his biological parents they still have a parents rights which is more then a siblings rights.
If the child was adopted the grand parents have no rights. It would be up to the adoptive parents whether any relationship could be maintained.
Part of the adoption process involves the termination of rights of the biological parents. When the adoption is finalized, the adoptive parents assume the rights and responsibilities of the biological parents.