Shoko
support
Fjh
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence
Democritus
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
Corroborate means to strengthen or support with evidence.
use scientific evidence to support your answer
Poriferans do not have distinct circulatory system. Instead water flow system support all these functions like circulatory, respiratory, excretory etc.
Is the evidence from the best source I can find
No, scientists do not claim that the discovery of an octopus species unchanged for 95 million years disproves evolution. Evolution is based on the concept of species changing over time in response to their environment, but not all species necessarily need to change to survive. The discovery of an unchanged species can provide valuable insights into the evolutionary process and the ways different organisms adapt to their surroundings.
Does this evidence support what I am trying to say
support
Fossils support his hypothesis.
No one can say for sure. Scientists believe that humans evolved from apes and monkeys. Religious groups believe that God created monkeys and humans separately. There is no specific evidence to support either of these claims, so no one knows whether people were once monkeys that evolved in time or not.
the holy books are the evidence
They use evidence to support their arguments.
Presumably, it is in reference to the evidence that will be, or was, presented in support of the prosecution.