Want this question answered?
• united leadership under the "Great Khan" • military discipline among warriors • effective strategy and tactics • knowledge of how to capture cities
Effective leadership, basically good government, 'universal' laws, the presence of soldiers and a generally peaceful period. Five good Emperors Expansion of Roman Rule~Apex Effective leaders
They were highly disciplined, with intelligent and effective commanders, were issued good quality equipment, and were well trained in the use of their equipment and effective combat formations and manoeuvres. The Romans also made a point of learning as much as they could about their enemies prior to engaging them in combat so they could take advantages of the enemies weaknesses and take contingencies against their strengths.Of course this was not always the case, most of the major defeats of the Roman army can be traced to failures of one or more of these factors.
The crusades were effective in cementing the hatred of Christians by Muslims. (The Christian performed horrendous deeds of cruelty).
As for being successful or effective in the goal to capture and maintain the holy city of Jerusalem. Only the First Crusade with King Richard I actually captured Jersualem. WIthin years of that capture the Muslims arose and overcame the Christian defenders. The subsequent crusades never had the same glory as the first. The crusades were effective in rallying the European people for a cause they beleived in. The crusades were also effective in establishing trade and knowledge between Europe and Asia.
Machiavelli's work "The Prince" revolutionized political thought by emphasizing the pragmatic use of power and the separation of ethics from politics, influencing how leaders governed. His emphasis on realism and effective leadership helped shape the shift towards more secular, pragmatic approaches in European politics and leadership during the Renaissance.
Machiavelli studied figures such as Cesare Borgia, a powerful Italian statesman and military leader, as inspiration for "The Prince." He also drew upon his own experiences working in Florentine politics to develop his ideas on effective leadership and governance.
"The Prince" by Niccolo Machiavelli is a political treatise that offers advice on effective governance, particularly focusing on the use of power and leadership strategies. It was written in the early 16th century and is considered a foundational work in political theory.
Machiavelli, full name Niccolò Machiavelli, was an Italian diplomat, philosopher, and writer during the Renaissance. He is best known for his political treatise "The Prince," which examines the use of power and the tactics of effective leadership. Machiavelli's work is often associated with the concept of realpolitik, where political decisions are guided by practical considerations rather than moral principles.
No, Niccolo Machiavelli was not a prince over Florence. He was a diplomat, politician, and writer from Florence in the 16th century. He is best known for his political treatise, "The Prince," which explores strategies for effective leadership and governance.
Tolerance hardwork Dedication
an effective leadership is power with people
Concern themselves with power and success
Yes, Machiavelli uses parallelism in "The Prince" to emphasize key points and principles. By repeating similar structures and phrases, he reinforces his advice on effective rule and leadership qualities for princes. This rhetorical device helps to make his arguments more persuasive and memorable to readers.
Machiavelli's work "The Prince" is a political treatise that examines the qualities of effective leadership, emphasizing the importance of pragmatic decision-making rather than moral considerations. Thus, whether he was a "good" prince would depend on one's interpretation of effectiveness in governance either based on morality or political success.
there was no effective leadership after garvey was deported to Jamaica.
Leaders should do whatever is necessary to achieve their goals.