Poor Richard III actually DIDN'T have a hump, but his left arm didn't really move properly and he couldn't hold things with his left arm.
Also, he didn't walk like the Humpback of Notro Dame. He walked normally, but Henry VII boasted about that he had defeated Richard III, and made fun of Richard III that his arm was weird, he walked like a dwarf, and that Richard III did have a hump.
The truth is, Richard III was quite of a nice guy, but he did do some of the things Henry VII had said.
he actually didnt, i think it was shakespeare who made it up for queen elizabeth i
No, King Richard III was normal looking and acting as far as we know, the idea of Richard III as a hunch backed monster comes from Tudor Propaganda against him, both before and after his fall, trying to paint him as unnatural and a monster, the Tudors kept up these anti-Richard/anti-York attacks up well after Richard III's dead in 1485 they go all the way up to Shakespeare's play Richard III written for Queen Elizabeth I (last Tudor monarch) in 1591, 106 years after Richard III's death.
No, I think your getting mixed up with Richard III.
Richard III didn't actually kill everyone. Athough there has been speculation that he killed his nephews (The Princes in the Tower) and his wife, as well as ministers and his subjects, there is not proof that he killed "everyone". Most of it was made up by the Tudors, who defeated Richard III in battle (Bosworth Field).
his body was dug up/found... research 'Findings of Richard III'
hi Richard 111 locked up his nephew's so he could become king then he killed them
facts
Things that are created are made up out of the human brain - thus creative facts can not exist as they are made up facts or fiction.
Richard Pryor
Shakespeare had already made a contribution to the popular History genre with his three Henry VI plays. (Possibly he may have written Edward III as well, but we'll leave that up for debate) In the last Henry VI play he created the character of Gloster, the man who will become Richard III. It was a reasonable progression to carry on and tell Richard's story, since the Gloster character was so vibrant.
Short facts.
There is no such thing as true evil in real people, although Shakespeare's portrayal of him would certainly have people thinking that. Richard III had been brought up in a society where family members killed family members and all the Plantagenets had to be on their guard. His older brother Edward had arranged for their other brother the Duke of Clarence to be killed so Richard III was not the first in his generation of brothers to arrange for another family member's murder. It is true that Richard III got swept away with ambition and that was his major downfall. But prior to his brother's death Richard was well liked particularly in the north of England and a popular soldier.