a letter written by the first-hand observer. Apexvs
The best primary source would be an original document or artifact that is contemporary to the event or topic being studied, created by someone who witnessed or experienced it firsthand. Examples include letters, diaries, photographs, government records, and interviews.
With regard to history, a primary source would be considered as such if they were eye witnesses to an event, such as the Siege of Jereusalem.
A contemporary scholar's discussion of Lincoln's Gettysburg Address would not be considered a primary source, but a secondary source. It may still be a valid source of information, however.
No, a primary source is an original document or an actual witness.
Yes, because it was taken at the time it happened.
director
Could be considered one. Depends on how much reconstruction/remodeling has been done on it. If you visit a 13th century castle you would see how it is made, laid out, and may get an understanding of how people lived, so it would be a primary source.
t
A newspaper article published in 2008 reporting on an event that occurred at that time would be considered a primary source.
No, a book written this year about life on a Spanish mission in Florida would not be considered a primary source, as it is a modern interpretation or analysis of historical events. Primary sources are original documents or artifacts that provide firsthand evidence of a specific time period or event.
Yes. Primary sources are first-hand evidence supporting a topic. Therefore, a map that directly shows evidence towards what you are stating or researching would be considered a primary source. Good luck!
Yes, because letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered what is called a primary source. A primary source is a document or artefact created at the time of the event. This means that letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered accurate historical evidence.
a letter in which a woman who participated in a polititial rally writes about the rally.