Want this question answered?
It did not have much effect on social stratification.
Is the stratification system of south africa closed open or mixed
It did not have much affect on social stratification It was not as successful as the American Revolution It took years for some nations to gain independence.
Dennis P. Hogan has written: 'Racial stratification and socioeconomic change in the American North and South' -- subject(s): Social classes, Social conditions
It was not succesful like this thot beside me
Bhagrath is not associated with any particular caste. It is a proper noun usually referring to a person's name or a place. Caste is a form of social stratification in South Asia that is not directly linked to this proper noun.
Slavery is a form of social stratification because it involves the forced control and exploitation of one group of people by another based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, or socio-economic status. It perpetuates inequality by denying the enslaved individuals basic human rights and opportunities for advancement, leading to a hierarchical social structure where one group has power and dominance over another.
the different types of pollution caused mainly by industrial companies. racial issues and inadequate medical facilities.
How did the social system in the south differ from the social system in new england?
cotton was considered as "king" in the south.
You might encounter such a stratification system in South Africa, where society is historically divided along racial lines into four main groups: Europeans (whites), Africans (blacks), Coloureds (mixed-race), and Asians (Indian and other Asian populations). This system was instituted during the apartheid era but still has lingering social, economic, and political effects in the country today.
South