Avatar is better and it is not stragity halo wars is though.
They were both very good but the only reason that one of them won was because they had more people! They were both very smart plans.
i say it depends because if you read the book before you see the movie, you won't really enjoy the movie, and in that case avatar is better. But , if u dont read the book, the movie will be awesome!!
It resembles Star Wars because they are both action. They are both are high-tech.
they both have the name Avatar in the name.
she is better at both because she did both when she was little
James Cameron's Avatar was shown in both 2D and 3D when it was released.
The Wicked Avatar has no inbuilt protections, but in theory, cannot ever be destroyed 'by battle' due to its effect. Obelisk and Ra therefore can't destroy it in battle because it will always be 100 ATK points stronger, but both Obelisk and Ra have Ignition Effects that can destroy enemy monsters, and both can destroy The Wicked Avatar.
Strategy is a science because one has many quantitative tools at their disposal to use to make decisions. It is an art because one has to adjust to many unknown factoring using their experience and skills.
James Camerons Avatar is distributed by both 20th Century Fox filmed Corporation & Sony Columbia Pictures.
Nukes, ICBM's contained both. In that case, cold was much better than hot.
Opinion: I thought that Avatar was much better than the movie 2012. They both had formidable special effects, but 2012's were all overdone. In 2012, all the characters escaped from every scenario within an inch of their lives, which got extremely repetitive. However, in Avatar, the special effects were used in an entirely different way, they actually MADE the movie, as opposed to making it seem cheesy. Much of the acting in 2012 was over-the-top, and all in all, the movie held no higher meaning than big action-y blow ups, one after the other.
they had guns, armor, and better immune systems.