Want this question answered?
No, the resources of the South were only crops, no factories, no munitions, no mills. The South has plantations and some cattle, cotton and some timber, but nothing for help during time of war.
Because the south had good, fertile land for farming so they needed workers to work on plantations. The perfect answer- slaves! The north was more industrial.
I believe it was slavery because it was more popular at that time in the south to have slaves than it was in the north. The south had so many slaves because of all the large plantations.
The South had the big plantations which needed a huge work force. The North had factories which didn't need quite as much unskilled labor.
The south had more plantations and needed more workers. there thinking most likely was something to this effect "why should we pay people to work when we can force people to?" it was cheaper to buy 300 slaves than to pay 300 white people.
Plantations existed more in the south mainly because of the slavery to farm them.
North had more factories, the South had more Cotton Plantations.
No. South Korea is More like developed country.
The cotton gin. It allowed the removal of the seeds.
It would increase the plantations, which means more slaves.
the south where they owned plantations and had white people work the land while they sipped mint julep's.
The South Rim.
The North had more capital than the South because of its dense population. Their industrialization was also much more developed than in the South.
South Korea
The North was semi-industrial and had many small farms, the South had gigantic farms called plantations.
It is a more developed country. I'm assuming that you are referring to North America, and not South America. America Is what you would call a "first world" country, meaning its more civilized, and developed.
No, the resources of the South were only crops, no factories, no munitions, no mills. The South has plantations and some cattle, cotton and some timber, but nothing for help during time of war.