Since the causes of the Revolutionary War were much more fundamental than the Boston Tea Party, it is likely that the revolution would have happened anyway.
The Boston Tea Party was a (traditionally believed) response to the British tea tax. The Tea Party itself taxed nothing.
yes
Like more than ten years ago.
You are asking about the Boston Massacre, but the event was propaganda for the colonists who were wanting to show a cause for leaving the British crown. Paul Revere drew a handbill to spin the event into something much more than it really was. Most history books today show the drawing when writing about it. Other events between colonists and troops happened in other places, but you don’t read about them. One reason is that Boston was the center of anti British activists.
Because the moon was closer that night
A third party
A third party
Few if any people would claim that Boston University is better than all the other universities in the United States.
Some colonists were throwing snowballs with sticks in them at the soldiers. One of the soldiers slipped and accidentally fired his gun. In confusion the other soldiers began to shoot at the colonists and killed 5 and injured 6.
they dumped the tea into the Boston Harbor
British were taxing a lot on tea. Boston people had to pay more than the Boston. They thought that wasn't fair so the got revenge. Boston people dressed liked Indians, and they threw the tea off the boat.