The adjusters for each company will complete an independent investigation, if there is still no way to establish fault it will either be mutually denied, settled on a 50/50 basis, or sent to arbitration.
The other person can sue you because you are at fault for the accident.
each contributes 50% to liability or fault.
In most cases, the adjuster would talk to everyone involved to hear their "version" of what happened. They would talk to any independent witnesses (someone who saw the accident that neither party involved knows) and form a decision based on that information as well as the location of the accident and where damages are on the vehicles.
No, and neither does an LVN
The constitution requires 2 witnesses or a confession in public court. Article II, Section 3, Clause 2 "2 witnesses to same act or a confession in public court."
Who is at fault has to do with the accident itself not the insurance coverage. A police report of the accident and looking at the proximate cause of the accident help determine fault.
Neither team will receive any points.
Neither he is a preposition zombie who enjoys country music on his days off.
Jehovah's Witnesses have not 'trembled' at the clergy of Christendom; neither have we 'trembled' at the most powerful governments. After all, we are Jehovah's own witnesses, and we have 'trembled' only before Jehovah God. (There you have the word 'trembled' 3 times.)
If two cars crash and neither driver has insurance, the police officer arriving on the scene will of course both issue you tickets for no insurance, and your license can be suspended. The officer will also determine who was at fault, generally the faulty party is responsible for damages. Otherwise you are both on your own for being negligent for not having insurance at the time of the accident.
If neither are Dominant Or Recessive then its called co dominance or spuedo - dominance
Stagnation